• 1218閱讀
  • 15回復

[求助] ECON =_____=" 急~~ [復制鏈接]

上一主題 下一主題
離線021214
 
發帖
7
好友元
12946
閱讀權限
7
貢獻值
0
只看樓主 倒序閱讀 使用道具 樓主   發表于: 2005-09-29
John rent a flat at $6000 a month. he decides to buy it from the owner. After buying it, he no longer pays rent. Does it mean that now the cost of USING the flat is ZERO?
唔該....有冇人識牙==
help me plz~
離線基斯坦奴
發帖
54802
好友元
0
閱讀權限
54802
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 1  發表于: 2005-09-29
我唔識英文.......
離線021214
發帖
7
好友元
12946
閱讀權限
7
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 2  發表于: 2005-09-29
咁你識econ嗎==?
離線基斯坦奴
發帖
54802
好友元
0
閱讀權限
54802
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 3  發表于: 2005-09-29
下面是引用021214於2005-09-29 20:41發表的:
咁你識econ嗎==?

咩黎.......
離線021214
發帖
7
好友元
12946
閱讀權限
7
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 4  發表于: 2005-09-29
牙.....=0=
econ係經濟=__________="
離線rBB
發帖
8485
好友元
21650
閱讀權限
32887
貢獻值
3
只看該作者 5  發表于: 2005-09-29
下面是引用西門吹雪於2005-09-29 20:45發表的:
咩黎.......

我中一都知咩係econ,同段英文啦
離線rBB
發帖
8485
好友元
21650
閱讀權限
32887
貢獻值
3
只看該作者 6  發表于: 2005-09-29
我諗answer is no~
because he has bought this house with money
離線john719
發帖
3850
好友元
13794
閱讀權限
3850
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 7  發表于: 2005-09-29
Econ o黎講應該係計opportunity cost(o.c.)
佢o既alternative use應該係賣o左間屋
由於佢選擇o左住
所以佢的o.c.應該會係賣o左間屋的錢

可能解得唔好
我econ好屎=.=
離線021214
發帖
7
好友元
12946
閱讀權限
7
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 8  發表于: 2005-09-29
好la.......
唔該曬你地喎><
離線艾云
發帖
1935
好友元
4750
閱讀權限
19613
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 9  發表于: 2005-09-29
全部錯哂......

John rent a flat at $6000 a month. he decides to buy it from the owner. After buying it, he no longer pays rent. Does it mean that now the cost of USING the flat is ZERO?

ANS:As John is the owner of the flat,he is able to lend it to others and get rental income.If he uses the flat himself,the highest valued option forgone is the rental income he gives up.Therefore,the cost of using the flat is not zero.The cost is the potential rental income,$6000 a month.
離線021214
發帖
7
好友元
12946
閱讀權限
7
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 10  發表于: 2005-09-29
係咪真係岩架.......
你好似好勁牙....
如果咁答呢==?
Certainly,there is a cost of using the flat.
It is because he need to pay money for buying that,cost is involved in this case. He need to give up his money for buying that.
離線艾云
發帖
1935
好友元
4750
閱讀權限
19613
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 11  發表于: 2005-09-29
下面是引用021214於2005-09-29 21:34發表的:
係咪真係岩架.......
你好似好勁牙....
如果咁答呢==?
Certainly,there is a cost of using the flat.
It is because he need to pay money for buying that,cost is involved in this case. He need to give up his money for buying that.


唔關PAY MONEY係買屋事

個COST係佢唔租出去,選擇自己住,而放棄左個可以收既租金
離線021214
發帖
7
好友元
12946
閱讀權限
7
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 12  發表于: 2005-09-29
哦......
你真係好勁牙.....
econ好難==
離線tl9189
發帖
7640
好友元
3704
閱讀權限
7640
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 13  發表于: 2005-09-29
NO~~AR....佢有cost 係 using the flat.
佢會有oppotunity cost in using the flat, such as selling it or 租出去收租金。
不過要視乎佢既highest value option forgone係d 乜先知佢既cost係乜野∼
另外,佢仲要俾用呢間flat既 cost. 例如:裝修等...

應該無解錯∼∼
離線kylau
發帖
802
好友元
102317
閱讀權限
7361
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 14  發表于: 2005-09-29
下面是引用新手於2005-09-29 21:30發表的:
全部錯哂......
John rent a flat at $6000 a month. he decides to buy it from the owner. After buying it, he no longer pays rent. Does it mean that now the cost of USING the flat is ZERO?
ANS:As John is the owner of the flat,he is able to lend it to others and get rental income.If he uses the flat himself,the highest valued option forgone is the rental income he gives up.Therefore,the cost of using the flat is not zero.The cost is the potential rental income,$6000 a month.


The above answer is correct from my pt of view

係計opportunity cost, i.e. the highest value forgone for not taking the action.