ce econ [復制鏈接]

Suppose the US government decreases the quota for HK garments exported to
the USA. This will lead to
A. a shortage of HK garments in the USA.
B. an increase in the income of garment producers in the USA.
C. a surplus in the balance of trade in the USA.
D. a decrease in the expenditure of US consumers on HK garments.

why B?

supply of HK product decrease
demand for US product increase (substitutes)
total revenue of US product increase

其實decrease the quota係解比少左入黎?
我理解左放鬆左個quota tim

仲有呢條
Mr. Chan is a lawyer. He wants to start his own business by opening a law firm. He can raise funds by
 
(1)    Borrowing from banks.
(2)    Admitting his friends as limited partners to form a limited partnership.
(3)    Forming a private limited company and issuing shares.

A.    (1) only
B.    (1) and (2) only
C.    (2) and (3) only
D.    (1),(2) and (3)

ans:a
why(2)唔得

引用第2樓rBB於2010-03-20 11:08發表的“”:
其實decrease the quota係解比少左入黎?
我理解左放鬆左個quota tim [表情]

好簡單~ 即係本來有 5 個 quota, decrease 左可能去到得番 3 個~

引用第3樓rBB於2010-03-20 11:45發表的“”:
仲有呢條
Mr. Chan is a lawyer. He wants to start his own business by opening a law firm. He can raise funds by
 
(1)    Borrowing from banks.
(2)    Admitting his friends as limited partners to form a limited partnership.
.......

係咪因為 limited partners 唔可以參與 management?

假如陳生佢組成左 limited partnership 佢都管理唔到間公司?

引用第5樓丹尼屎於2010-03-20 11:59發表的“”:
係咪因為 limited partners 唔可以參與 management?
假如陳生佢組成左 limited partnership 佢都管理唔到間公司?

但limited partnership都可以有general partners...mr chan都可以做general partner ga ma


======

"The business will be dissolved on the death of any one partner."
呢句又岩唔岩?

引用第6樓rBB於2010-03-20 12:07發表的“”:
但limited partnership都可以有general partners...mr chan都可以做general partner ga ma
======

睇漏左 Admitting his friends as limited partners to form a limited partnership.

即係陳生係果個 general partner .. 即係佢有 unlimited liability

即係佢未必能夠從此 raise 到 funds

引用第8樓丹尼屎於2010-03-20 12:16發表的“”:
睇漏左 Admitting his friends as limited partners to form a limited partnership.
即係陳生係果個 general partner .. 即係佢有 unlimited liability
.......

唔關事


最合理解釋應該係佢朋友就算係limited partner 都未必肯比錢

引用第9樓諗唔到改咩名好於2010-03-20 12:34發表的“”:
唔關事
最合理解釋應該係佢朋友就算係limited partner 都未必肯比錢

咁呢句呢?
"The business will be dissolved on the death of any one partner."
(in a general partnersgip)

引用第10樓rBB於2010-03-20 12:36發表的“”:
咁呢句呢?
"The business will be dissolved on the death of any one partner."
(in a general partnersgip)

問題問緊點raise fund
呢句講緊partnership o既結束
無關係

引用第11樓諗唔到改咩名好於2010-03-20 12:40發表的“”:
問題問緊點raise fund
呢句講緊partnership o既結束
無關係

唔係...呢句唔係呢條問題的..係另一條問題來

引用第12樓rBB於2010-03-20 12:43發表的“”:
唔係...呢句唔係呢條問題的..係另一條問題來

問緊乜

引用第13樓諗唔到改咩名好於2010-03-20 12:46發表的“”:
問緊乜 [表情]

就係問緊in a general partnership,死左條友會唔會令成個firms dissolves?
true or false question
但又無答案