gramma Question [復制鏈接]

was to be constructed. 呢句在時間上點解?在past的時間, 這是不是future tense?

It is past tense, since it use "was", and to be contructed, this is called "passive voice"

第一次見到was+to be

引用第1樓victorleung於2007-10-17 02:58發表的“”:
It is past tense, since it use "was", and to be contructed, this is called "passive voice"

其實的都知是past tense, 不過.......如果在過去的時間, 例如一年前, 呢個是不是起好了, 還是未起?

引用第0樓wylalan於2007-10-11 14:33發表的“gramma Question”:
was to be constructed. 呢句在時間上點解?在past的時間, 這是不是future tense?

呢句係past tense, passive, 在當時來說有未來的意思, 但係唔係future tense~

引用第3樓wylalan於2007-10-18 12:48發表的“”:
如果在過去的時間, 例如一年前, 呢個是不是起好了, 還是未起?

無從判斷
當時未起好就是了