[英超]爵爺：費托責無旁貸 [復制鏈接]

【now.com體育】周日英超，曼聯作客險勝9人車路士，費格遜認為費蘭度托利斯要為第2面黃牌負責，卻沒有直接回答是否插水。
周日英超榜首大戰，曼聯作客險勝9人車路士3:2，球證判決引起多方爭議，領隊費格遜（Alex Ferguson）則認為，兩黃一紅的西班牙前鋒費蘭度托利斯，就算第2面黃牌有商榷餘地，也要為個人行為負責。



紅魔擊敗榜首車路士，與曼城同樣落後1分，形勢激烈，費爵爺分析道：「伊雲洛域被逐是全場的分水嶺，我們那時候已可贏得比賽，於是派出查維亞靴南迪斯，之後他攻入奠勝一擊。」



「曼聯踢多1人後，氣勢完全不同了；別人認為第3球越位，我覺得那是一點點運氣。」



被問到費托應否被判「插水」時，爵爺的回答又令人大開眼界，堪稱是政客的教材：「莊尼伊雲斯或者碰到他一點，他可以繼續去，卻選擇跌倒，我不明白他跌倒的原因，那時候他已領得黃牌，所以被逐離場是他的錯誤。」




source: http://sports.now.com/home/news/details?newsId=4517241128&matchId=null&sportsChosen&keyword

真係咩人都有....

不過，以費SIR 既性格同地位，佢先唔會CARE 你班友仔點諗…………鐘意講咩咪講咩囉。

真秘密:明顯係錯判,
但費sir邏輯上其實唔完全錯晒,有contact其實真係唔代表足以令你一定要跌低,
當然,呢種情況下,十個有八個都會"選擇"跌,
點解要quote住"選擇",係因為跌低其實係正常過唔跌,
或者應該話跌低係比較自然,但其實球員如果有心,係有能力撐住唔跌低.
..... .. (2012-10-29 23:52) 

我明你講咩。


其實費SIR 如果以第三者既身份去睇件事或評論件事。佢的確有權話托利斯係插水。因為你講得無錯既係，唔係掂到就等如無插水。好多時我地睇波都會話，嘩，掂一掂你駛唔駛仆得咁勁，個動作駛唔駛咁大呀？所以，呢樣野其實可以好主觀。而最重要係，其實真係無得PROVE 的………

仲記唔記得上次曼聯對利物浦，GJ 係後邊輕輕「掂」到曼聯球員而被判12碼？我地都好多人覺得對方係插水架！其實都係類似情況。己方一定覺得對方係扮野的！相反，跌個個只會以有冇被人碰到作為大前題！大家一定企係對立面黎睇件事。

但問題係，球例上你就唔可以咁樣去判件事了。球證唔可以單單以「覺得」作為判罰既原則。呢件事上，球證只能夠話當時我睇唔到伊雲斯有掂到托利斯，所以我判佢插水。佢不能話，係呀，我睇到架！我知有掂到。但我覺得佢係插水囉………咁死得。除非個個動作真係好唔合常理，係人都覺得係假摔啦。否則，疑點歸於被告，你都唔應該係無辦法肯定球員係插水既情況下判佢插水的。


而費SIR 呢一刻係唔應該以第三者身份去評論件事。因為佢係既得利益者。所以你講得岩，其實少說為妙。又或者可以話，當時千鈞一髮，伊雲斯個動作又咁細，球證睇唔到其實亦好正常。至於托利斯係咪插水就唔係我可以或者應該評論既事了。咁答咪算囉。又幫到球證開脫，又可以講明無論件事係點都唔關曼聯事。

醜。
有接觸根本已經唔可以判插水
衰衰地認左得益，係球証錯咪好囉
仲要面皮十尺厚咁話Torres

g3rMan:我想睇有冇呢段訪問既英文版，始終譯番做中文可能會有偏差 (2012-10-30 00:05) 

Both Evans and Ferguson later admitted that there was contact, but the United boss insisted: “Torres could have gone on and he didn’t.

“I think Jonny may have caught him just a little but you can carry on running and he chose to go down.

“He could have carried on and scored, that’s what I don’t understand.

“When I was a player, I would never have missed the chance to go through. I would have taken that opportunity to score every time.

“But he’s gone down and that is the issue. And he’s already been booked, so it’s his own fault.”

Evans added: “At the time I didn’t feel I made any contact but I’ve seen it again and I made a bit of contact — but not enough to bring him down.

“I think he probably realised he wasn’t going to get the ball and went down.

“So I think the referee has made the right decision to send him off.”

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/4614717/Alex-Ferguson-Its-all-your-fault-Torres.html

我想睇有冇呢段訪問既英文版，始終譯番做中文可能會有偏差

明顯係錯判,
但費sir邏輯上其實唔完全錯晒,有contact其實真係唔代表足以令你一定要跌低,
當然,呢種情況下,十個有八個都會"選擇"跌,
點解要quote住"選擇",係因為跌低其實係正常過唔跌,
或者應該話跌低係比較自然,但其實球員如果有心,係有能力撐住唔跌低.
不過一般做法都係自然跌,唔會特登刻意去唔跌
(明就明,唔明就算了)
以上所講唔係想話費sir講得啱或者球證錯唔晒,純粹係邏輯上去講,
唔係亂加/亂填d咩字眼都適用.

至於呢個判決球證點都係錯得離譜..呢點無庸置疑.


當然,結果就係曼聯得益,而身為得益者ge費sir去講呢番說話自然好令人反感.

轉移視線....

贏波開心到講野都語無倫次

費sir

from slow motion, it is clear there has a contact.
Driving, usually apply to cheating for penalty.
Torres falls at least 10 yrds away from the box, and there is a contact, what rules to deliver yellow card.
My opinion, referee 200% is making a mistake.

費sir：叫你咁做就咁做啦


贏左，吹呀？


球證，好波

咩話？3分鐘？至小10分鐘啦大佬


下次補時至小要有10分鐘先得


結果引起英國暴動，萬人齊hi費Sir寶寶


最後，被迫下台


公喜晒


I love you guys

唔出聲會比人話佢默認吹錯架~

贏到咁好心出少句聲