[電影][電影評論]達文西密碼(The Da Vinci Code) [復制鏈接]

導演: 朗侯活(Ron Howard)
主演: 湯漢斯(Tom Hanks), 柯德莉塔圖(Audrey Tautou), 伊恩麥基倫(Ian McKellen), 艾佛莫連拿(Alfred Molina)
片種: 劇情
日期: 2006-05-18

巴黎羅浮宮館長遭人謀殺死於館內，屍體旁邊留下一些奇怪的密碼，哈佛大學宗教符號學教授蘭登（湯漢斯飾）剛好在巴黎，於是獲邀與密碼女專家蘇菲（柯德莉塔圖飾）一起調查，期間竟發現達文西的一件作品裡藏有匪夷所思的破案線索。
預告片

早就睇完成本小說了

下面是引用j3_106於2006-05-10 20:20發表的:
早就睇完成本小說了 [表情]

我都係~~
咁你睇戲嗎?

下面是引用紅魔鬼marco於2006-05-10 20:28發表的:
我都係~~
咁你睇戲嗎?

考慮下...等影評先

下面是引用j3_106於2006-05-10 20:30發表的:
考慮下...等影評先 [表情]

我會睇的

今日睇明報......
破解達文西密碼

我可能會去睇^^''

書就一早睇完...

戲就... 應該都會去睇...

下面是引用red_trash於2006-05-11 23:19發表的:
書就一早睇完...
戲就... 應該都會去睇...

How s the book?Mind to share your opinion on it?

下面是引用sakura_3212004於2006-05-12 01:24發表的:
How s the book?Mind to share your opinion on it? [表情]

About the controversial content in this book, if you're a Christian, most certainly you won't like this book. Since I'm not a Christian, I find the concept rather amusing. However, I'm neither a historian, I have no idea how valid that concept is. In order not to spoil other viewers, I'm not going to discuss the content here. But my feeling is if you treat this book as an ordinary thriller fiction and disregard the validity of all the religious implications inside the book, you'll find it a reasonably enjoyable book.

Nevertheless, it will NEVER be a classics because halfway through the book, I can guess all the twists that will happen in the latter part of the book. So, all in all, there is no surprise left for me.

下面是引用red_trash於2006-05-12 19:46發表的:
About the controversial content in this book, if you're a Christian, most certainly you won't like this book. Since I'm not a Christian, I find the concept rather amusing. However, I'm neither a historian, I have no idea how valid that concept is. In order not to spoil other viewers, I'm not going to discuss the content here. But my feeling is if you treat this book as an ordinary thriller fiction and disregard the validity of all the religious implications inside the book, you'll find it a reasonably enjoyable book.
Nevertheless, it will NEVER be a classics because halfway through the book, I can guess all the twists that will happen in the latter part of the book. So, all in all, there is no surprise left for me.

聽你咁講呢本只係一本普通小說
只係題材關於宗教所以先咁hit..

下面是引用江川徹於2006-05-12 20:26發表的:
聽你咁講呢本只係一本普通小說
只係題材關於宗教所以先咁hit..

絕對係...如果唔係涉及敏感宗教問題，呢部書只會係一部普通偵探小說...

下面是引用red_trash於2006-05-12 19:46發表的:
About the controversial content in this book, if you're a Christian, most certainly you won't like this book. Since I'm not a Christian, I find the concept rather amusing. However, I'm neither a historian, I have no idea how valid that concept is. In order not to spoil other viewers, I'm not going to discuss the content here. But my feeling is if you treat this book as an ordinary thriller fiction and disregard the validity of all the religious implications inside the book, you'll find it a reasonably enjoyable book.
Nevertheless, it will NEVER be a classics because halfway through the book, I can guess all the twists that will happen in the latter part of the book. So, all in all, there is no surprise left for me.

thx for the opnion,short and precise!

but i dont think i am in a hunger to read such book,i got so many other books still being abandoned on the desk,waiting to be read in these coming holidays!

唔知好唔好睇呢...

有冇人會去睇@@