• 10744閱讀
  • 397回復

[英超]修咸頓後衛雲迪積克(Virgil van Dijk)向球會遞交轉會申請 [復制鏈接]

上一主題 下一主題
離線freezefox
發帖
161257
好友元
362332
閱讀權限
260899
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 240  發表于: 2017-06-08
話驚比人罰個D 真係得啖笑。咁多年黎,有邊單英國足總真係走去干涉?真係罰,罰你幾多?幾萬磅呀?個DEAL 講緊六千萬磅架!拎1%出黎都比多你啦!利記會放在眼內?

宜家擺明就係反檯。比到六千萬你都仲要擺姿態。咁我地都識擺姿態既。即刻公開講,OK ,宜家我地唔買啦。你賣比第二家啦。成段聲明不卑不亢,有風度又有立場,都不知幾型!

呢一著肯定修咸頓完全無諗過!


拎得六千萬出黎,你會驚係巿場到買唔到好後防?


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線羅力亞
發帖
173320
好友元
3255
閱讀權限
173437
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 241  發表于: 2017-06-08
Virgil van Dijk and Liverpool - 'A complete and utter shambles'
Ian Doyle believes we are witnessing one of the most embarrassing moments in a proud 125-year history

What a complete and utter shambles.

A farce. An embarrassment. A humiliation. A joke.

None of those words, though, can truly do justice to the dramatic u-turn Liverpool have performed regarding their interest in Virgil van Dijk.

Barely 48 hours ago, the Reds were confident they would sign the Southampton defender after the player indicated he would sooner move to Anfield than Manchester City, Chelsea and, as it later transpired, Arsenal.

And now this, Liverpool taking the unprecedented step of releasing a statement apologising to Southampton for any misunderstanding and publicly declaring they are no longer interested in van Dijk.

Even the most seasoned observer was taken aback. This kind of thing just doesn’t happen.

Usually, it’s not until deep into the transfer window that Liverpool fans grow irate at their club’s business in the market.

This summer, the Reds haven’t even bothered to wait for it to open.

What a complete and utter shambles.

With Liverpool keen to make a statement in the transfer market, this probably wasn’t the one they wanted to make. One that suggests that, at times, they can be haplessly incompetent.

Harsh? Hardly.

Talk about a baptism of fire for Liverpool’s chief executive Peter Moore. Officially in the role for less than a week, he’s watching one of the most embarrassing incidents in the club’s history unfold before his eyes. In fairness to him, negotiating transfers is no longer within his remit.

That honour falls to sporting director Michael Edwards , this his first summer transfer window since being elevated into the newly-created position.

Something somewhere has gone wrong. Very, very wrong.

Let’s be grown up about this for a moment. Transfers are a grey area, approaches are made that skirt the very limits of what is acceptable.

All van Dijk’s suitors would have, in some indirect manner, had the ear of the player.

But for Liverpool to retreat so rapidly when Southampton approached the Premier League to investigate an illegal approach suggests the Reds have not so much edged as leapt over the boundaries.

Either that or they’re, well, just not very good at it. Not very clever. Not savvy enough.

Are the club wary of Jurgen Klopp - suggested as being crucial in van Dijk’s preference for Anfield - being implicated in any investigation?

Or are they mindful of even the slightest indiscretion given they were in April handed a two-year ban from signing Academy players from any other English clubs after pleading guilty to, yes, “tapping up” a 12-year-old Stoke player?

There’s no obvious limit on the sanctions that could be handed out, and that includes a transfer ban of senior players similar to that, for different reasons, Atletico Madrid are currently struggling with.


The reverberations of this debacle will be felt for a long, long time to come.

Of more immediate concern, though, is the short term. Is there still confidence Liverpool are capable of sealing such big deals? How will rival clubs view them? Will they think twice given, on the face of it, how amateur the Reds look right now?

For the sake of their own reputation, and to regain at least some of the goodwill of their bemused and angry fanbase, Liverpool must conclude a deal as soon as possible. Mohamed Salah , Gelson Martins, anyone to show they still mean business.


Having chosen Klopp and Liverpool, he now must return to Southampton or pursue a move to clubs he has already rejected once.

The option of van Dijk handing in a transfer request in an attempt to force a move through could have been considered were it not for the explicit nature of Liverpool’s remarkable statement.

Van Dijk has kept his counsel throughout the transfer saga. He’s not the first person to be left high and dry by a football club. He won’t be the last.

But the Dutchman is right now probably thinking what we all are.

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/virgil-van-dijk-liverpool-a-13153435

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線羅力亞
發帖
173320
好友元
3255
閱讀權限
173437
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 242  發表于: 2017-06-08
回 freezefox 的帖子
freezefox:話驚比人罰個D 真係得啖笑。咁多年黎,有邊單英國足總真係走去干涉?真係罰,罰你幾多?幾萬磅呀?個DEAL 講緊六千萬磅架!拎1%出黎都比多你啦!利記會放在眼內?
宜家擺明就係反檯。比到六千萬你都仲要擺姿態。咁我地都識擺姿態既。即刻公開講,OK ,宜家我地唔買啦。你賣比第二 .. (2017-06-08 09:54) 

因為之前已經有單比人罰

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線freezefox
發帖
161257
好友元
362332
閱讀權限
260899
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 243  發表于: 2017-06-08
回 羅力亞 的帖子
羅力亞:因為之前已經有單比人罰[表情] (2017-06-08 09:59) 

你講丹尼京治?咪就係罰錢咁大把囉。有咩所謂。


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線Seefood
發帖
26873
好友元
8
閱讀權限
26893
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 244  發表于: 2017-06-08
以家買唔到就係件好事
離線G-shock
發帖
11832
好友元
75411
閱讀權限
11832
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 245  發表于: 2017-06-08
有邊次罰錢會真係嚇到球會?
離線羅力亞
發帖
173320
好友元
3255
閱讀權限
173437
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 246  發表于: 2017-06-08
回 freezefox 的帖子
freezefox:你講丹尼京治?咪就係罰錢咁大把囉。有咩所謂。 (2017-06-08 10:01) 

Liverpool fined £100,000 and handed two-year ban on signing academy players

Liverpool have been fined £100,000 by the Premier League and handed a two-year ban on signing academy players from other clubs for a rule breach.

It relates to the club's approach to a 12-year-old academy player at Stoke City in September last year.

Liverpool will be banned from signing any academy players who have been registered with a Premier League or EFL club in the previous 18 months.

This second year of the ban will be suspended for a three-year period.


In September 2016 Liverpool made an application to register the Stoke City Academy player and compensation was agreed.

But the application was rejected by the Premier League Board.

An investigation by the Premier League found that Liverpool spoke to the youngster and his family before they should have and also paid for him and some of his family to attend a game at Anfield.

Liverpool also offered to pay the player's school fees, which were being paid by Stoke at this time, but this was a breach of newly-introduced regulations which state a benefit can only be offered if it is applicable to all youngsters across the club's academy and this was not the case.

Premier League rules ban the offer of any inducements from clubs to encourage a move.

Liverpool have admitted the rule breaches.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/39508491

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線freezefox
發帖
161257
好友元
362332
閱讀權限
260899
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 247  發表于: 2017-06-08
回 羅力亞 的帖子
羅力亞:Virgil van Dijk and Liverpool - 'A complete and utter shambles'
Ian Doyle believes we are witnessing one of the most embarrassing moments in a proud 125-year history
What a complete and utter shambles.
....... (2017-06-08 09:59) 

多鬼餘,成篇講到利物浦唔完成交易就錯咁………喂,宜家係人地要告我地話我地犯規呀!咁點買呀?始作俑者係邊個都未攪清楚。成篇文一個point 都無,一味淨係話要買要買。


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線freezefox
發帖
161257
好友元
362332
閱讀權限
260899
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 248  發表于: 2017-06-08
回 羅力亞 的帖子
羅力亞:Liverpool fined £100,000 and handed two-year ban on signing academy players
Liverpool have been fined £100,000 by the Premier League and handed a two-year ban on signing academy players from other clubs for a rule breach.
....... (2017-06-08 10:07) 

買幼齒中招就連皇馬、巴塞、馬體會都領野啦。


但呢單係所謂非法接觸球員,呢個其實好具爭議性。個陣車仔都成日比人話犯禁啦,結果有冇一單係鋤得入?咁多年黎我就唔覺英超有邊隊會因為咁而受到重罰。


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線羅力亞
發帖
173320
好友元
3255
閱讀權限
173437
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 249  發表于: 2017-06-08
回 freezefox 的帖子
freezefox:多鬼餘,成篇講到利物浦唔完成交易就錯咁………喂,宜家係人地要告我地話我地犯規呀!咁點買呀?始作俑者係邊個都未攪清楚。成篇文一個point 都無,一味淨係話要買要買。[表情] (2017-06-08 10:13) 

點都好
宜家搞到咁,更加要儘快買到人
話比人知,我地有決心繼續買人

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線freezefox
發帖
161257
好友元
362332
閱讀權限
260899
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 250  發表于: 2017-06-08
回 羅力亞 的帖子
羅力亞:點都好
宜家搞到咁,更加要儘快買到人
話比人知,我地有決心繼續買人[表情] (2017-06-08 10:22) 

呢樣我唔擔心。個market 咁大。


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線posouth
發帖
28591
好友元
152373
閱讀權限
28611
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 251  發表于: 2017-06-08
回 羅力亞 的帖子
羅力亞:Liverpool fined £100,000 and handed two-year ban on signing academy players
Liverpool have been fined £100,000 by the Premier League and handed a two-year ban on signing academy players from other clubs for a rule breach.
....... (2017-06-08 10:07) 

一單還一單, 首先點都唔支持做違規野, 俾錢, 私底下有利益輸送等等一律唔啱. 但講到tap up, 講真好睇做到有幾「揚」, 有冇過界, 幾乎隊隊都有某程度接觸球員探風. 直接揾職員同球員傾又係tap up, 通過幾層中介向佢暗示遞transfer request又係tap up, 好多灰色地帶.

有早前Academy個單野, 可以理解係今次管理層驚死, 出statement. 但係點睇都係乘機收手兼出啖氣. 正如兩位老細出緊價auction, 一位老細出價高到上天, 騎虎難下, 然後呀賣家話可唔可以唔好企件貨咁近, 唔係我告Q你, 個下真係火黎到........即刻講句, sorry, 我唔啱, 呢場拍賣我唔玩了, 你自己玩埋佢.
[ 此帖被posouth在2017-06-08 10:31重新編輯 ]
Klopp Best XI. Thank you for all the memories in the last 9 years!!
離線posouth
發帖
28591
好友元
152373
閱讀權限
28611
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 252  發表于: 2017-06-08
回 freezefox 的帖子
freezefox:多鬼餘,成篇講到利物浦唔完成交易就錯咁………喂,宜家係人地要告我地話我地犯規呀!咁點買呀?始作俑者係邊個都未攪清楚。成篇文一個point 都無,一味淨係話要買要買。[表情] (2017-06-08 10:13) 

X2, 我都睇唔明. 只可以理解話佢覺得好可惜, 好好一單野因為呢個原因買唔到. 我地既觀點係開心都黎唔切. 貴到離哂地早就應該收手, 真好彩!
Klopp Best XI. Thank you for all the memories in the last 9 years!!
離線羅力亞
發帖
173320
好友元
3255
閱讀權限
173437
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 253  發表于: 2017-06-08
回 posouth 的帖子
posouth:一單還一單, 首先點都唔支持做違規野, 俾錢, 私底下有利益輸送等等一律唔啱. 但講到tap up, 講真好睇做到有幾「揚」, 有冇過界, 幾乎隊隊都有某程度接觸球員探風. 直接揾職員同球員傾又係tap up, 通過幾層中介向佢暗示遞transfer request又係tap up, 好多灰色地帶.
.. (2017-06-08 10:30) 

其實好多人都插緊FSG驚死
根本依d買賣私下接觸agent同球員係好正常
潛規則黎,根本冇需要道歉
宜家搞到好似自認咁

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線posouth
發帖
28591
好友元
152373
閱讀權限
28611
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 254  發表于: 2017-06-08
回 羅力亞 的帖子
羅力亞:其實好多人都插緊FSG驚死
根本依d買賣私下接觸agent同球員係好正常
潛規則黎,根本冇需要道歉
宜家搞到好似自認咁[表情]  (2017-06-08 10:35) 

吹咗17頁, 結果都個吉, 搞笑.....

唯一可惜既係Klopp真係有心重用佢, van Dijk亦視利記為首選, 一段恩緣成唔到事......
Klopp Best XI. Thank you for all the memories in the last 9 years!!