• 7749閱讀
  • 207回復

誤判!真的是球賽中的一部分嗎!? [復制鏈接]

上一主題 下一主題
離線杜菲斯
發帖
37255
好友元
0
閱讀權限
37259
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 195  發表于: 2010-07-01
引用第193樓benkwan38h2010-07-01 21:11發表的“”:
唔明 [表情] ,可唔可以用中文 [表情]

查字典啦
離線ming仔
發帖
49086
好友元
230
閱讀權限
49088
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 196  發表于: 2010-07-01
引用第193樓benkwan38h2010-07-01 21:11發表的“”:
唔明 [表情] ,可唔可以用中文 [表情]

diehard果d字都唔明?
離線Valencia25
發帖
22686
好友元
10234
閱讀權限
22751
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 197  發表于: 2010-07-01
引用第196樓名稱已被使用2010-07-01 21:31發表的“”:
diehard果d字都唔明? [表情]

我中二升中三咋
離線杜菲斯
發帖
37255
好友元
0
閱讀權限
37259
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 198  發表于: 2010-07-01
引用第197樓benkwan38h2010-07-01 21:54發表的“”:
我中二升中三咋 [表情]

咪扮野
離線Valencia25
發帖
22686
好友元
10234
閱讀權限
22751
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 199  發表于: 2010-07-01
引用第198樓杜菲斯2010-07-01 21:55發表的“”:
咪扮野 [表情] [表情]

鬼有昆你呀
離線杜菲斯
發帖
37255
好友元
0
閱讀權限
37259
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 200  發表于: 2010-07-01
引用第199樓benkwan38h2010-07-01 21:55發表的“”:
頂 [表情] 鬼有昆你呀 [表情]

真架咩

sorry 囉
離線Valencia25
發帖
22686
好友元
10234
閱讀權限
22751
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 201  發表于: 2010-07-01
引用第200樓杜菲斯2010-07-01 21:56發表的“”:
真架咩 [表情]
sorry 囉 [表情]

你一直同緊個中二雞傾計
離線杜菲斯
發帖
37255
好友元
0
閱讀權限
37259
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 202  發表于: 2010-07-01
引用第201樓benkwan38h2010-07-01 21:58發表的“”:
你一直同緊個中二雞傾計 [表情]

我真係唔知
離線Valencia25
發帖
22686
好友元
10234
閱讀權限
22751
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 203  發表于: 2010-07-01
引用第202樓杜菲斯2010-07-01 21:59發表的“”:
我真係唔知 [表情]

正常既
離線真秘密
發帖
12556
好友元
23697
閱讀權限
12557
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 204  發表于: 2010-07-02
引用第191樓sikingthegreat2010-07-01 20:46發表的“”:
"你死你嘅事, 唔好要大家同你一齊死"
呢個心態, 咪就係人地所講嘅armchair fans嘅心態囉.
即係點解人地d lads, 即係local diehard fans, 會咁抗拒/排斥d外來fans就係咁解.
第2度我唔知, 呢20幾年, 如果講uk, went into administration嘅球會有20幾間, 除左今年嘅portsmouth, 全部都係d小球會. average一年有一間多d. d資源, 金錢, 同埋注意力, 都去晒d頂級賽事/球隊到. d基層嘅足球承受緊幾多問題?好多呢d低層嘅足球團體 (唔單止球會), 連day-to-day operation都有困難. 呢d係足球運動入面好重要嘅根. 呢d野, 有幾多armchair fans會理?
.......

你個論點都幾好笑.
你應該叫日本唔好起d抗地震ge屋,好多窮國家d屋都好簡陋,一地震就死得人多,日本係要咁唔公平走去起d抗震力咁高ge屋,咁就係好唔公平law,明明大家都係人類,明明地震就應該要死人,而家日本搞到地震造成ge傷害低晒,日本地震死咁少人,窮國地震死咁多人,真係好唔公平law

窮國人大肚咪又係照樣體力勞動過活,生仔果刻更加連醫生都未必有,
你地而家d人大肚就巴巴閉閉,生仔又勞師動眾,跟本就唔應該搵醫生,你有得搵醫生,窮國人無,
咁樣對窮國人好唔公平law

唔好成日講埋d似是而非ge論點先得架..
發帖
7122
好友元
755
閱讀權限
26949
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 205  發表于: 2010-07-02
引用第204樓真秘密2010-07-02 00:32發表的“”:
你個論點都幾好笑.
你應該叫日本唔好起d抗地震ge屋,好多窮國家d屋都好簡陋,一地震就死得人多,日本係要咁唔公平走去起d抗震力咁高ge屋,咁就係好唔公平law,明明大家都係人類,明明地震就應該要死人,而家日本搞到地震造成ge傷害低晒,日本地震死咁少人,窮國地震死咁多人,真係好唔公平law
窮國人大肚咪又係照樣體力勞動過活,生仔果刻更加連醫生都未必有,
.......

引喻失義
重作
離線Gabriel
發帖
28309
好友元
30039
閱讀權限
28309
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 206  發表于: 2010-07-02
引用第191樓sikingthegreat01-07-2010 20:46發表的“”:
"你死你嘅事, 唔好要大家同你一齊死"
呢個心態, 咪就係人地所講嘅armchair fans嘅心態囉.
即係點解人地d lads, 即係local diehard fans, 會咁抗拒/排斥d外來fans就係咁解.
第2度我唔知, 呢20幾年, 如果講uk, went into administration嘅球會有20幾間, 除左今年嘅portsmouth, 全部都係d小球會. average一年有一間多d. d資源, 金錢, 同埋注意力, 都去晒d頂級賽事/球隊到. d基層嘅足球承受緊幾多問題?好多呢d低層嘅足球團體 (唔單止球會), 連day-to-day operation都有困難. 呢d係足球運動入面好重要嘅根. 呢d野, 有幾多armchair fans會理?
.......

sorry

我唔係好明你呢段comment同個topic既關聯性係邊...可唔可以約略解釋下
離線OldSosad
發帖
35850
好友元
43635
閱讀權限
107849
貢獻值
7
只看該作者 207  發表于: 2010-07-09
Fifa to make refereeing changes for future World Cups

Goal-line technology is back on the agenda after Fifa revealed this World Cup is set to be the last tournament under the existing refereeing system.

Fifa general secretary Jerome Valcke told the BBC that TV replays showing Frank Lampard scoring a goal against Germany was a "bad day" for organisers.

And Valcke suggested changes will be made before the 2014 World Cup.

"We're talking about a goal not seen by the referee which is why we are talking about new technology," said Valcke.

Fifa's general secretary also suggested that the use of two extra referees positioned on the goal-line - a system trialled last season in the Europa League and set to be used in the Champions League this coming season - might be used in future World Cups.

"Let's see if this system will help or whether giving the referee an additional four eyes will give him the comfort and make duty easier to perform," added Valcke.

"I would say that it is the final World Cup with the current refereeing system."

Although Valcke's comments will be interpreted as a change of policy by Fifa following the International Football Association Board's (Ifab) decision to reject goal-line technology and other aids for referees in March, the Fifa general secretary wants the whole approach to refereeing to be reformed.

"The teams and the players are so strong and so fast. The game is different and the referees are older than all the players," said Valcke.

"The game is so fast, the ball is flying so quickly, we have to help them and we have to do something and that's why I say it is the last World Cup under the current system."

Fifa president Sepp Blatter has repeatedly rejected calls for the introduction of goal-line technology or TV replays, insisting an element of human error has always been a part of the game.

Opponents have also pointed to concerns over universality - that all levels of the game should be subjected to the same rules and methods of refereeing.

But following the Lampard "goal" in England's 4-1 defeat by Germany and Carlos Tevez's offside strike for Argentina against Mexico in a game the South American side won 3-1, Blatter performed a U-turn, saying that it would be a "nonsense" not to reopen the file on technology.

Ifab - the game's rule making body which consists of representatives of the English, Scottish, Northern Irish and Welsh FAs as well as four representatives from Fifa - is due to hold a meeting on 21 July where the issue is expected to be discussed.

But Valcke said it was unlikely serious discussions would be held until a further meeting scheduled for October.

In March, Ifab heard presentations from two companies pitching to introduce systems which they say provide definitive proof when the ball has crossed the line for a goal.

But both the proposals from Cairos Goal-line technology, which uses a microchip inside a football and magnetic fields around the goal line, and Hawk-Eye, which uses six television cameras positioned around the goal, were rejected.

The Cairos system was tested by Fifa in the World Club Championships in Japan in 2007, but despite their claims that the test was a success, Ifab again rejected the proposal in March 2008.


It was debated again in 2009 but again turned down.

Both Hawk-Eye and Cairos insist cost is not an issue as they offered to pay for the installation of the system in return for a share of sponsorship rights.

Ifab also turned down the chance to introduce the system of two extra referees positioned on the goal-line in time for the World Cup in South Africa.