• 2716閱讀
  • 49回復

[英超]迪亞高哥斯達和包列斯達分別被英足總起訴,哥斯達被追罰停賽3場,包列斯達上訴得值獲撤銷紅牌 [復制鏈接]

上一主題 下一主題
離線羅力亞
發帖
173078
好友元
1020
閱讀權限
173195
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 30  發表于: 2015-09-23
Gabriel red card overturned after Arsenal win appeal

Last Updated: 22/09/15 5:17pm

Arsenal's claim of wrongful dismissal over Gabriel's red card against Chelsea on Saturday has been upheld following an FA hearing.

As a result, the player's three-match suspension has been withdrawn with immediate effect.

Gabriel was dismissed for violent conduct during Saturday's game against Chelsea after clashing with Blues striker Diego Costa, who had also been involved in a confrontation with Laurent Koscielny.


The defender is currently subject to a separate FA charge of improper conduct in relation to that game and has until 6pm on Thursday to reply.

Arsenal and Chelsea have also been charged with failing to control their players during the game.

More to follow...

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10001705/gabriel-red-card-overturned-after-arsenal-win-appeal
[ 此帖被羅力亞在2015-09-23 00:48重新編輯 ]

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線迪克
發帖
42896
好友元
7088
閱讀權限
120318
貢獻值
14
只看該作者 31  發表于: 2015-09-23
嘩,天有眼
只愛足球
發帖
41012
好友元
29305
閱讀權限
66104
貢獻值
8
只看該作者 32  發表于: 2015-09-23
包列斯達唔駛停賽

好野
四星德國!!KING OF THE WORLD 2014

離線火鳳凰
發帖
91264
好友元
54168
閱讀權限
91264
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 33  發表于: 2015-09-23
回 啪啪啪啪啪啪 的帖子
啪啪啪啪啪啪:包列斯達唔駛停賽
好野 (2015-09-23 00:48) 

The defender is currently subject to a separate FA charge of improper conduct in relation to that game and has until 6pm on Thursday to reply...

呢個都可能要停……
[ 此帖被火鳳凰在2015-09-23 00:59重新編輯 ]
發帖
41012
好友元
29305
閱讀權限
66104
貢獻值
8
只看該作者 34  發表于: 2015-09-23
阿仙奴中堅基比爾包列斯達在上周六作客車路士的比賽中,因為向車路士前鋒迪亞高哥斯達有攻擊性行為,所以被球證直指出示紅牌驅逐離場,按例要停賽三場。不過,阿仙奴為此作出上訴,英足總就此作出了裁決,撤銷了該面紅牌,包列斯達亦不需要面臨三場停賽的處分。

蘋果
四星德國!!KING OF THE WORLD 2014

離線羅力亞
發帖
173078
好友元
1020
閱讀權限
173195
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 35  發表于: 2015-09-23
Chelsea striker Diego Costa given three-match ban

Last Updated: 22/09/15 9:12pm

Chelsea striker Diego Costa will serve a three-match suspension after being found guilty of an FA charge of violent conduct.

The charge relates to an incident in Saturday's 2-0 win over Arsenal at Stamford Bridge, which was not seen by match referee Mike Dean but was the subject of a retrospective investigation.

In a statement released by the club Chelsea said they were "extremely disappointed" with the decision and "would await the written reasons before commenting further."

Costa had denied the charge over the incident in which he appeared to put his hands in the face of Gunners defender Laurent Koscielny.

An FA statement read: "An FA charge against Diego Costa for violent conduct not seen by the match officials but caught on video has been found proven following an Independent Regulatory Commission hearing.

"The Chelsea forward will, therefore, serve the standard penalty of a three-match suspension with immediate effect.

"The charge, which the player denied, was in relation to an incident involving Arsenal's Laurent Koscielny in the 43rd minute of the game on Saturday [19 September 2015]."

The Spain international will miss Wednesday's League Cup match with Walsall, plus Premier League games against Newcastle and Southampton.

Earlier on Tuesday, Arsenal defender Gabriel won an appeal against his red card for confronting Costa after the initial incident.

The FA announced in a separate statement that it had accepted Arsenal's challenge to the decision and withdrawn the three-match suspension.

Gabriel still faces a separate charge of improper conduct for his reaction after being shown the red card by referee Dean and has until 6pm on Thursday to reply.

The FA also charged both Chelsea and Arsenal for failing to control their players, they also have until 6pm on Thursday to respond.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10001922/chelsea-striker-diego-costa-given-three-match-ban

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線senal
發帖
119823
好友元
1210540
閱讀權限
119898
貢獻值
18
只看該作者 36  發表于: 2015-09-23
回 火鳳凰 的帖子
火鳳凰:The defender is currently subject to a separate FA charge of improper conduct in relation to that game and has until 6pm on Thursday to reply...
呢個都可能要停…… [表情] (2015-09-23 00:57) 

咁奇怪既

YFF Overall Rank
2008-2009: 40 | 2009-2010: 1 | 2010-2011: 210 | 2011-2012: 64 | 2012-2013: 9 | 2013-2014: 157 | 2014-2015: 6
今季 Fantrax: 2
發帖
4070
好友元
2
閱讀權限
4070
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 37  發表于: 2015-09-23
http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2015/09/club-statement.html?extcmp=SOCIA_FB_ENG_NEWS_STATEMENT

Club statement
NEWS 1 HOUR

Chelsea Football Club has released the following statement following a decision by the FA Regulatory Commission.

The statement reads:

'We are extremely disappointed with the FA Regulatory Commission's decision to suspend Diego Costa. We will await their written reasons before commenting further.'
離線myrmidon
發帖
6103
好友元
30784
閱讀權限
6103
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 38  發表于: 2015-09-23
好混亂

如果dean係純DC投訴而俾紅硬係唔合理. 但事實gabriel係有報復性抽水, 如果場上球証任何一個睇到呢個紅牌都成立.

而家FA判上訴得值, 間接係話gabriel黃牌後抽水球証係睇唔到既

Dean唔係單憑球員投訴就俾牌咁低水準下話
離線kevin6543
發帖
12419
好友元
8243
閱讀權限
12419
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 39  發表于: 2015-09-23
回 myrmidon 的帖子
myrmidon:好混亂 [表情]
如果dean係純DC投訴而俾紅硬係唔合理. 但事實gabriel係有報復性抽水, 如果場上球証任何一個睇到呢個紅牌都成立.
而家FA判上訴得值, 間接係話gabriel黃牌後抽水球証係睇唔到既
....... (2015-09-23 10:13) 

就算兩黃之後停一場都好過直紅
離線煙花
發帖
37458
好友元
377091
閱讀權限
37458
貢獻值
3
只看該作者 40  發表于: 2015-09-23
用戶被禁言,該主題自動屏蔽!
離線Elvis
發帖
2004
好友元
32163
閱讀權限
5225
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 41  發表于: 2015-09-23
可惜3分已失, 但好過無啦
離線迪克
發帖
42896
好友元
7088
閱讀權限
120318
貢獻值
14
只看該作者 42  發表于: 2015-09-23
回 煙花 的帖子
煙花:虎尾腳唔洗停,以後可以成日用[表情] [表情]  (2015-09-23 12:53) 

但幫人洗面同以胸撞人就唔好成日用喇
只愛足球
離線煙花
發帖
37458
好友元
377091
閱讀權限
37458
貢獻值
3
只看該作者 43  發表于: 2015-09-23
用戶被禁言,該主題自動屏蔽!
離線火鳳凰
發帖
91264
好友元
54168
閱讀權限
91264
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 44  發表于: 2015-09-23
其實呢單野我同大家有小小唔同意見……

我係比較認同 gary 仔所講既︰

Gary Neville ✔ @GNev2
3 games for that. At worse it was two yellows = 1 game. Violent? No way..

DC 果的行徑無疑係好令人討厭,但係果的用手抓人面呀、用胸 bump 人呀,全部都係一的非常乞人僧既毛手毛腳,而並唔係開"爭"打人呀、收山腳呀、報復打人呀果的所謂既 violent conduct。 如果分開逐個動作去睇的話,其實全部都係屬於一的黃牌動作。

所以如果 FA 係判佢食兩黃甚至三黃停一場,我個人會覺得較為合適,而家判 violent conduct 我覺得就係比傳媒大肆報導所影響……

p.s. fifa 對於 violent conduct 既定義︰

A player is guilty of violent conduct if he uses excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball.

Violent conduct may occur either on the field of play or outside its boundaries, whether the ball is in play or not.

He is also guilty of violent conduct if he uses excessive force or brutality against a team-mate, spectator, match official or any other person.