• 19402閱讀
  • 423回復

[英超]Suarez因種族歧視,被英足總罰停賽8場;利物浦已決定不作上訴! [復制鏈接]

上一主題 下一主題
離線freezefox
發帖
161257
好友元
362332
閱讀權限
260899
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 30  發表于: 2011-12-21
引用第30樓liuming2011-12-21 10:45發表的“”:
我唔係想爭辯d咩...
只係最重要的判詞都未到手 (只少我未見到有)
.......



佢被判有罪,重罰八場,這已經是事實了。


仲有爭論既餘地嗎?


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線g3rMan
發帖
56229
好友元
6575
閱讀權限
57395
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 31  發表于: 2011-12-21
8場
離線火鳳凰
發帖
91264
好友元
54168
閱讀權限
91264
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 32  發表于: 2011-12-21
FA 既 statement︰

http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplinary/NewsAndFeatures/2011/luis-suarez-20-12-11

An Independent Regulatory Commission has today [Tuesday 20 December 2011] found a charge of misconduct against Luis Suarez proven, and have issued a suspension for a period of eight matches as well as fining him £40,000, pending appeal.

On 16 November 2011, The Football Association charged Luis Suarez with misconduct contrary to FA Rule E3 in relation to the Liverpool FC versus Manchester United FC fixture on 15 October 2011.

A hearing took place from 14-20 December 2011 before an Independent Regulatory Commission of The FA to consider the charge.

The Independent Regulatory Commission announced its decision on 20 December 2011, which is as follows:

Mr Suarez used insulting words towards Mr Evra during the match contrary to FA Rule E3(1);

the insulting words used by Mr Suarez included a reference to Mr Evra's colour within the meaning of Rule E3(2);

Mr Suarez shall be warned as to his future conduct, be suspended for eight matches covering all first team competitive matches and fined the sum of £40,000;

the [penalty] is suspended pending the outcome of any appeal lodged by Mr Suarez against this decision.

The Independent Regulatory Commission will provide written reasons for its decision in due course setting out:

(a)       the findings of fact made by it;

(b)       the reasons for its decision finding the charge proved; and

(c)       the reasons for the penalty.


Mr Suarez has the right to appeal the decision of the Independent Regulatory Commission to an Appeal Board. An appeal must be lodged within 14 days of the date of the written reasons for the decision.

The penalty is suspended until after the outcome of any appeal, or the time for appealing expires, or should Mr Suarez decide not to appeal. The reason for this is to ensure that the penalty does not take effect before any appeal so that Mr Suarez has an effective right of appeal.

仲要等埋 fa 將會出既 written reasons 同證據,點解佢唔一次過出
離線ODIN
發帖
29780
好友元
0
閱讀權限
29780
貢獻值
5
只看該作者 33  發表于: 2011-12-21
引用第33樓bmx2011-12-21 10:51發表的“”:
FA 既 statement︰
http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplinary/NewsAndFeatures/2011/luis-suarez-20-12-11
An Independent Regulatory Commission has today [Tuesday 20 December 2011] found a charge of misconduct against Luis Suarez proven, and have issued a suspension for a period of eight matches as well as fining him £40,000, pending appeal.
.......



唔知之前FA有冇試過重罰之後被成功上訴??
離線G-shock
發帖
11832
好友元
75411
閱讀權限
11832
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 34  發表于: 2011-12-21
引用第29樓freezefox2011-12-21 10:44發表的“”:
我諗已經唔再係有事冇事有罪冇罪既問題了。係宜家既足總,究竟係咪真係執行公義。
.......

話哂都係英國隊長,大細超有幾奇怪
離線火鳳凰
發帖
91264
好友元
54168
閱讀權限
91264
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 35  發表于: 2011-12-21
引用第34樓liuming2011-12-21 10:57發表的“”:
唔知之前FA有冇試過重罰之後被成功上訴??


應該實有上訴成功既 case 既。
離線ODIN
發帖
29780
好友元
0
閱讀權限
29780
貢獻值
5
只看該作者 36  發表于: 2011-12-21
引用第36樓bmx2011-12-21 11:01發表的“”:
應該實有上訴成功既 case 既。



唔係減刑wor...
係完全被推翻果種...(不過真係微乎其微...)
離線火鳳凰
發帖
91264
好友元
54168
閱讀權限
91264
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 37  發表于: 2011-12-21
引用第37樓liuming2011-12-21 11:05發表的“”:
唔係減刑wor...
係完全被推翻果種...(不過真係微乎其微...)


根據球例,侮辱對手/球證應該至少停兩場,至於點解要停到八場就要等佢既 written reasons。

完全推翻應該無可能,極其量減到去兩場,即係 2-8場既 range。

p.s. 趕住去打波,唔傾了
離線謝拉傑
發帖
52607
好友元
29951
閱讀權限
52608
貢獻值
4
只看該作者 38  發表于: 2011-12-21
引用第35樓G-shock2011-12-21 10:58發表的“”:
話哂都係英國隊長,大細超有幾奇怪 [表情]


咁同種族歧視有乜分別?!
離線呀威
發帖
40490
好友元
34302
閱讀權限
40490
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 39  發表于: 2011-12-21
八場, 等上訴
離線him
發帖
23061
好友元
97
閱讀權限
23061
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 40  發表于: 2011-12-21
咁又唔洗8場咁大劑呀
離線隨風
發帖
11450
好友元
123260
閱讀權限
11450
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 41  發表于: 2011-12-21
Mario Ballotelli: The FA are willing to ban someone based on one persons claim, with no video evidence? In that case, the whole ManU squad racially abused me.


一語中的 抓住重點

FA
離線freezefox
發帖
161257
好友元
362332
閱讀權限
260899
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 42  發表于: 2011-12-21
引用第42樓隨風2011-12-21 11:57發表的“”:
Mario Ballotelli: The FA are willing to ban someone based on one persons claim, with no video evidence? In that case, the whole ManU squad racially abused me.
[表情] [表情] [表情]
一語中的 抓住重點 [表情] [表情] [表情]
.......




所以真係好難分辦佢係天才定白痴!


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
發帖
67977
好友元
0
閱讀權限
67977
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 43  發表于: 2011-12-21
引用第42樓隨風2011-12-21 11:57發表的“”:
Mario Ballotelli: The FA are willing to ban someone based on one persons claim, with no video evidence? In that case, the whole ManU squad racially abused me.
[表情] [表情] [表情]
一語中的 抓住重點 [表情] [表情] [表情]
.......

點解balo永遠都咁型架!!
離線朗拿度
發帖
6263
好友元
190
閱讀權限
6263
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 44  發表于: 2011-12-21
引用第42樓隨風2011-12-21 11:57發表的“”:
Mario Ballotelli: The FA are willing to ban someone based on one persons claim, with no video evidence? In that case, the whole ManU squad racially abused me.
[表情] [表情] [表情]
一語中的 抓住重點 [表情] [表情] [表情]
.......


BALO 永遠都咁出眾, 成為眾人效法既對象