• 589104閱讀
  • 33884回復

◤紅軍研究所◢ - ☆ You'll Never Walk Alone ☆ 永不言敗! [復制鏈接]

上一主題 下一主題
離線freezefox
發帖
160724
好友元
359532
閱讀權限
260366
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 19245  發表于: 2012-11-05
我地仲要比藉口自己到幾時?


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線Zxen
發帖
10266
好友元
58775
閱讀權限
10266
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 19246  發表于: 2012-11-05
回 freezefox 的帖子
freezefox:我地仲要比藉口自己到幾時? (2012-11-05 11:37) 

等赢球等到颈长了
  
離線reve
發帖
55251
好友元
7186
閱讀權限
55251
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 19247  發表于: 2012-11-05
回 freezefox 的帖子
freezefox:我地仲要比藉口自己到幾時? (2012-11-05 11:37) 

我仲未睇羅sir今次講麼添
keep walking, keep scoring, let's do it again!!! YNWA
離線K.B
發帖
1938
好友元
9068
閱讀權限
1938
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 19248  發表于: 2012-11-05
其實無咩需要籍口
心理上已經調整左
年輕 改緊打法 無射手 lucas傷令中場失
離線K.B
發帖
1938
好友元
9068
閱讀權限
1938
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 19249  發表于: 2012-11-05
其實無咩需要籍口
心理上已經調整左
年輕 改緊打法 無射手 lucas傷令中場失
發帖
67977
好友元
0
閱讀權限
67977
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 19250  發表于: 2012-11-05
I'm starting to worry that Luis Suarez is to this column as the ravens are to the Tower of London. Please don't go back to Uruguay, Luis. Myself and the Yeomen have to put food on the table.

This week, though, he was on the receiving end of a couple of incidents, and was very much the innocent party in a couple of clashes with Fabricio Coloccini.

......

Earlier in the game, Liverpool felt that they should have had a penalty for a foul involving them same two men, this time in the penalty area albeit with far less nastiness.

I have a lot of sympathy with the Reds on that one, but I also understand why the spot kick was not given. In real time I thought it looked like a good tackle, as my eyes were on the ball, and Coloccini very clearly played it.

Watching replays, however, I can see that his right leg - nowhere the ball and possibly even detached from his body - came through Suarez and brought him down. The replays show, to me, that it was a foul, and therefore should have been a pen.

Replays are a luxury, though, and on this occasion, from the angle he had and at the speed he would have seen it, I have no complaints with the referee not giving what he can't have been 100% sure about.

http://www.football365.com/ref365/8226584/Ref365

寫column嘅球證都講, 如果睇replay, 第一下係冇問題, 但後尾嗰隻腳, 真係trip到luis....
發帖
67977
好友元
0
閱讀權限
67977
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 19251  發表于: 2012-11-05
回 K.B 的帖子
K.B:其實無咩需要籍口
心理上已經調整左
年輕 改緊打法 無射手 lucas傷令中場失 (2012-11-05 16:32) 

我都見唔到需要咩藉口~~
總之暫時黎講, 見到direction, 而家要一直捱到一月睇下有咩reinforcements...
發帖
67977
好友元
0
閱讀權限
67977
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 19252  發表于: 2012-11-06
How Much Time Is A 'Philosophy' Worth?

Liverpool's 1-1 draw with Newcastle told a familiar story of wasted chances; Matt Stanger wonders when the pressure will start to increase on Brendan Rodgers...


Although Liverpool utterly dominated Newcastle on Sunday, Brendan Rodgers' assertion that his team deserved what would have been a 'brilliant win' smacks of a manager clutching at straws following another wasted opportunity to bag three valuable points.

After running Newcastle ragged in the second half and creating enough chances to win three matches, Liverpool certainly should have secured only their third Premier League victory of Rodgers' reign. But the manager's claim that his team missed out on a 'brilliant' win seems somewhat far-fetched, considering Newcastle are yet to win away in the current campaign and are struggling to find the form that catapulted them into fifth last season.

Perhaps this point is too concerned with semantics, but Rodgers' declaration echoed the memorable line reeled out by Roy Hodgson in October 2010 when he opined that the Reds had secured a 'famous victory' after sneaking past Bolton 1-0.

The reaction to what was seen as Hodgson's rather skewed perspective contributed to the campaign to have the manager defenestrated, with Liverpool's win at the Reebok lifting them to a total of only 12 points after Hodgson's first ten games in charge. Sunday's draw leaves Rodgers' Reds a point worse off at the same juncture.

With Rodgers avoiding the same level of scrutiny despite a mixed start to his Liverpool tenure, it seems that Hodgson's biggest mistake during his time at Anfield was failing to announce that he had a 'philosophy' when he arrived in the summer of 2010.

Despite having a far more extensive and impressive CV than Rodgers - which included taking Fulham to the Europa League final weeks before he joined the Reds - Hodgson immediately found himself under intense pressure, which led to fans petitioning for him to be sacked just 18 games into the season.

Over 10,000 signatures were collected online, with supporters issuing a statement that said: 'Mr Hodgson asked to be judged after ten games. We have given him 18 and he has provided the worst start to a league campaign for 57 years. Even by his own measures, he deserves to go.'

So what then for Rodgers, who thus far has broken several new records in regard to worst starts? With the manager struggling to solve Liverpool's profligacy - which has seen them repeatedly throw away matches they should have won - the Reds continue to dwell in the bottom half of the table with a points average that can be extrapolated to a measly total of 41 over the course of the full season.

The Sunday papers carried the story that Rodgers believes the club's re-building job will take longer than the length of his three-year deal, with the manager seemingly already trying to buy time. "There is no quick fix here," said Rodgers. "We have to balance the finances and that is what we are doing. There will be a bit of pain on the way." The obvious question is just how much pain will those connected to the club accept?

Rodgers will hope that John Henry and the fans will be able to overlook finishing in ninth or tenth this season if there are signs of improvement on the pitch, but bearing the fates of Hodgson and Kenny Dalglish in mind, it's clear that both have a breaking point.

At the moment, the manager's claim to a philosophy is guiding him through a difficult early run. But Rodgers' admission that it will take years rather than weeks for Liverpool to rebuild will not come as encouraging news to fans trying to remain optimistic.

Matt Stanger

中立嘅人黎睇, 又真係另一回事....
雖然係有方向, 但係要犧牲到咩程度呢....?
係咪有一套哲學就可以解釋一切呢....?

個人黎講都係嗰句, 到一月轉會窗過埋, 我地就知道究竟BR有冇運行....
離線freezefox
發帖
160724
好友元
359532
閱讀權限
260366
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 19253  發表于: 2012-11-06
回 reve 的帖子
reve:我仲未睇羅sir今次講麼添 (2012-11-05 16:01) 

其實唔係單單指羅SIR 一個。球隊成績好壞亦唔係單單一個人(領隊)可以改變。宜家既表現,唔能夠只係歸咎於佢一個人既領導能力。所謂巧婦難為無米之炊,你無米比佢,佢自然就煮唔到飯。




但如果成隊波,包括球員,管理層,甚至球迷,都覺得打得唔好係有理由的,場場波失分係可以原諒的,可以接受的,咁佢地就唔會有動力去求進的了。


[ 此帖被freezefox在2012-11-06 10:36重新編輯 ]


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線K.B
發帖
1938
好友元
9068
閱讀權限
1938
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 19254  發表于: 2012-11-06
tot想要卡9
卡9黎講 呢隻前鋒喺呢個體系打唔上主力
但佢嘅年紀身份唔打主力又真是好難令佢接受
雖然佢有一定用途 但在佢立場離開似乎已成定局
發帖
67977
好友元
0
閱讀權限
67977
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 19255  發表于: 2012-11-07
回 K.B 的帖子
K.B:tot想要卡9
卡9黎講 呢隻前鋒喺呢個體系打唔上主力
但佢嘅年紀身份唔打主力又真是好難令佢接受
雖然佢有一定用途 但在佢立場離開似乎已成定局 (2012-11-06 18:02) 

最緊要係.... 準備出幾錢?
又搶我地sigurdsson, 又搶我地dempsey, 唔屈大筆d都對唔住自己喎~~
離線謝拉傑
發帖
52607
好友元
29951
閱讀權限
52608
貢獻值
4
只看該作者 19256  發表于: 2012-11-07
前廠迷:一個阿仙奴球迷之死

一個晚上,一場波。 看了多年Arsenal的比賽,今天忍不住第一次(亦是最後一次)就Arsenal比賽發表個人意見。

曼聯,有隊形,有效率,有邊路,仲有RVP。阿仙奴, 冇隊形, 冇防守,冇效率,冇突破,亦冇decisive player。

1. 後衛:Mertesacker:慢人九拍,Vermaelen:英甲(or 乙?)中堅水平,仲要經常犯低級錯誤,Santos:不是後衞,冇防守意識和技術。結論: Arsenal有幾場可以保持清白之身,個d對手今季一定將會係護級分子。

2. 邊路:左:Podolski:冇速度冇信心突破,Santos不但唔識出波,仲成日被偷波;右:Ramsey,已第90次話佢冇ball sense冇速度冇位置感;Sagna:只是一個普通後衛,你原諒他吧。結論:咁既line-up,效果比利物浦各放兩個Jordan Henderson 係左右邊路更正。

3. 前鋒:Giroud攞明只有Heading ok,但全隊一隊除了只會在聯賽杯被派出場的Arshavin以外無人識出波。結論:一隊聲稱打小組短傳既球隊的終極嘗試。Wenger, you are the man

.4. 踢法:阿仙奴的踢法是由後衛或中場中路球員傳波俾邊路球員,邊路球員接到波後,傳番去中場中路,如此重覆三次,直至後對方被偷波後打反擊。結論:隊波possession唔錯,其他球隊一定十分羡慕。

5. 領隊:買人/用人一流: Walcott, Gervinho, Djourou, Ramsey, Gibbs, 甚至Chamberlain…. 共通點係咩? 對了,就是足球智商如果10係滿分,佢地全部係2或以下,即係玩三國志你唔駛降低佢地既智力,佢地都會中混亂。排陣有新意: Gervinho, Podolski, Giroud 同ramsey, 正選左第n次都係踢到不知所謂後,下場都係照出。

6. 球會管理層:目標係年年有profits,向股東交代,成功球會的典範,不會債台高築。Arsenal以前係高貝利,當時有氣氛,有好球員,有球味,英超爭冠分子,歐聯決賽對巴塞都有力一拼外,亦都無點聽過佢蝕錢。而家除左目標係攞第四有歐聯踢等如冠軍,有全英超最高票價,球星一個一個離去,球迷提早離場後,仲有d乜?

7. 認真我就傻仔,既然咁多complains,邊個叫我仲支持Arsenal? 一個球迷決定是否支持一支球隊,不是因為一場波的輸贏,其實可能無得解,「就是喜歡」,亦可能是因為一間球會既style, determination,或commitment over years…。 Arsenal 老早已不是當年那支有球味,瀟洒,有信心,踢法華麗悅目加實用的球隊,只是還有球迷繼續癡心的等。我想大部分球迷鍾意睇波,是因為好睇,就係咁簡單。就此,我實在再找不到一個再繼續支持Arsenal的理由,從昨晚開始,我不再是Arsenal的球迷,對,我已心死。

來源:http://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E5%89%8D%E5%BB%A0%E8%BF%B7-%E5%80%8B%E9%98%BF%E4%BB%99%E5%A5%B4%E7%90%83%E8%BF%B7%E4%B9%8B%E6%AD%BB-180500905--sow.html

我覺得...... 我應該寫番篇一個利迷之死......  
離線Gabriel
發帖
28309
好友元
30039
閱讀權限
28309
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 19257  發表于: 2012-11-07
即係玩三國志你唔駛降低佢地既智力,佢地都會中混亂

離線Gabriel
發帖
28309
好友元
30039
閱讀權限
28309
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 19258  發表于: 2012-11-07
回 sikingthegreat 的帖子
sikingthegreat:最緊要係.... 準備出幾錢?
又搶我地sigurdsson, 又搶我地dempsey, 唔屈大筆d都對唔住自己喎~~[表情] (2012-11-07 09:28) 

我地係無可能用卡路爾屈到錢

唯有希望既係唔好俾人笑咁耐而已
離線英俊
發帖
56901
好友元
48247
閱讀權限
55902
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 19259  發表于: 2012-11-07
回 Gabriel 的帖子
Gabriel:我地係無可能用卡路爾屈到錢
唯有希望既係唔好俾人笑咁耐而已 (2012-11-07 12:54) 

睇個勢都係westham用1Xm買...