• 3735閱讀
  • 123回復

車仔既十二碼.........有錯勿插 [復制鏈接]

上一主題 下一主題
離線智者
發帖
14653
好友元
46535
閱讀權限
37357
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 105  發表于: 2007-08-21
關於有無參與進攻呢個問題.......

Penalty Kick
A penalty kick is awarded if any of the above ten offences is committed
by a player inside his own penalty area, irrespective of the position
of the ball, provided it is in play.

大家自行判斷
  
離線TZZero
發帖
7565
好友元
35556
閱讀權限
7565
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 106  發表于: 2007-08-21
引用第0樓智者2007-08-20 17:57發表的“車仔既十二碼.........有錯勿插”:
球證可以係無做錯.........
球例 : http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/federation/laws%5fof%5fthe%5fgame%5f0708%5f10565.pdf
球證可以認為芬倫 careless 咁 trip 到馬路達 bo..........
而且判十二碼同有無參與進攻無關係的
.......


如果這樣在球例上可以判 PK 的話...
曼城打比中 Evra 都有 1 球可以判 PK la...

果球 Evra 左邊 45 度半單刀姿勢殺入禁區...
係佢離門 10 碼左右射中網側當時 ge 不足 1 秒內...
曼城有個球員從後辣左 Evra
發帖
7122
好友元
755
閱讀權限
26949
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 107  發表于: 2007-08-21
唔知點解我覺得問題o既根源係因為被判罰12碼o既係利物浦
發帖
67244
好友元
8598
閱讀權限
67246
貢獻值
4
只看該作者 108  發表于: 2007-08-21
引用第108樓sheepsheephin2007-08-21 02:21發表的“”:
唔知點解我覺得問題o既根源係因為被判罰12碼o既係利物浦 [表情] [表情] [表情] [表情]
利迷出名熱情
發帖
67977
好友元
0
閱讀權限
67977
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 109  發表于: 2007-08-21
引用第107樓TZZero2007-08-21 02:10發表的“”:
如果這樣在球例上可以判 PK 的話...
曼城打比中 Evra 都有 1 球可以判 PK la...
.......

個球evra已經起左腳,成個過程完左corluka先埋到去,所以無事.... (好多時龍門接完個長傳,對方個前鋒都照衝埋去然後跌低..... 個d永遠唔會罰守方架嘛)
離線加歷查
發帖
42972
好友元
99
閱讀權限
42972
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 110  發表于: 2007-08-21
吾係12碼
離線---ReM!X---
發帖
6638
好友元
7683
閱讀權限
6638
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 111  發表于: 2007-08-21
看完場比賽我覺得可能球證看既角度見到芬倫推跌無球在腳嘅馬路達~
從慢鏡看係馬路達失去重心~ 呢球PK利記唔抵﹐但係英格蘭球證往往太多位要插﹗
離線Kun
發帖
15657
好友元
21
閱讀權限
15658
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 112  發表于: 2007-08-21
我覺得球十二碼冇麥錯

在球證的角道

Finnan真係諗住trip Malouda

給card哥道就明錯喇
離線Hernandez
發帖
19918
好友元
14822
閱讀權限
19919
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 113  發表于: 2007-08-21
引用第113樓◇車路士之迷◆2007-08-21 08:41發表的“”:
我覺得球十二碼冇麥錯
在球證的角道
Finnan真係諗住trip Malouda
.......

你係車仔fans?
離線winstonlam
發帖
3125
好友元
40
閱讀權限
3125
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 114  發表于: 2007-08-21
http://sport.independent.co.uk/football/premiership/article2881466.ece

Styles apologises to Liverpool but is sent on leave for penalty 'mistake'

Referee Rob Styles has apologised for denying Liverpool a valuable victory over Chelsea and been placed on temporary gardening leave for his mishandling of Sunday's fractious affair at Anfield.

The Professional Game Match Officials Limited, the body responsible for the country's leading referees, reacted to a weekend of controversy yesterday when it announced that Styles and Ian Gosling had been punished for their performances at Anfield and Craven Cottage respectively.

Styles fell victim to the PGMOL's strict self-regulation policy for the penalty award that enabled Frank Lampard to equalise Fernando Torres' opener for Liverpool on Sunday. The referee penalised Steve Finnan for a foul on Florent Malouda when the French international had clearly leapt into the Republic of Ireland defender but, refreshingly, he last night admitted his mistake and offered a public apology to the Anfield club. It is believed he also offered a personal apology to Rafael Benitez, who had described Styles' initial decision as "absolutely unbelievable".

The Hampshire official, who was accused of cracking under pressure from Chelsea players by the Liverpool captain Steven Gerrard, stated: "All referees enter into matches hoping not to make any mistakes but understanding that they may happen, what none of us want is for any mistake to potentially affect the result of the match. Yesterday, in mistakenly awarding a penalty, I accept that I may have affected the result of the match and for that I apologise."

Styles' contrition followed an announcement by PGMOL general manager Keith Hackett that the referee would not have been involved in any matches this weekend, with the organisation keen to demonstrate to Premier League clubs that officials will be held accountable for mistakes.

Hackett explained: "Accountability exists and we, the PGMOL, do expect referees to get big decisions correct. On this occasion it was wrong and therefore Rob will not be officiating next weekend.

"I spoke to Rob this morning and obviously he is extremely disappointed with the decision and admitted he got it wrong. I have left a message with Rafael Benitez to apologise."

There was further confusion at Anfield on Sunday when Styles appeared to book Michael Essien for a second time but did not show the Chelsea midfielder a red card. At the time Styles confirmed to fourth official Phil Dowd that the booking was for Chelsea captain John Terry, but Hackett admitted it was another aspect of Styles' performance at Anfield that needed to be improved.
離線freezefox
發帖
161221
好友元
362107
閱讀權限
260863
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 115  發表于: 2007-08-21
引用第115樓winstonlam2007-08-21 09:41發表的“”:
http://sport.independent.co.uk/football/premiership/article2881466.ece
Styles apologises to Liverpool but is sent on leave for penalty 'mistake'
Referee Rob Styles has apologised for denying Liverpool a valuable victory over Chelsea and been placed on temporary gardening leave for his mishandling of Sunday's fractious affair at Anfield.
.......




無用架啦!就算連足總、裁判個個都出黎承認個球係錯誤判斷!認為呢個錯誤係:"absolutely unbelievable".!球迷判斷是非既原則都係一句:「總之我支持個隊就係岩哂!」



是非黑白?食啦………


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線winstonlam
發帖
3125
好友元
40
閱讀權限
3125
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 116  發表于: 2007-08-21
fair enought, I give up
離線freezefox
發帖
161221
好友元
362107
閱讀權限
260863
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 117  發表于: 2007-08-21
引用第117樓winstonlam2007-08-21 09:55發表的“”:
fair enought, I give up [表情]



有時見到d 咁既現象,真係好無奈……


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線CKL
發帖
22382
好友元
5879
閱讀權限
22382
貢獻值
5
只看該作者 118  發表于: 2007-08-21
引用第107樓TZZero2007-08-21 02:10發表的“”:
如果這樣在球例上可以判 PK 的話...
曼城打比中 Evra 都有 1 球可以判 PK la...
.......

加下講緊球證問題

場場波都唔同球證
發帖
67977
好友元
0
閱讀權限
67977
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 119  發表于: 2007-08-21
引用第113樓◇車路士之迷◆2007-08-21 08:41發表的“”:
我覺得球十二碼冇麥錯
在球證的角道
Finnan真係諗住trip Malouda
.......

我之前咪話囉,球證點落決定係取決於見到d咩... 問題就係,球證企到非常之近,視線又無受阻,有咩可能看錯?