UID︰8978
引用第1199樓weijian1988於2009-05-12 18:46發表的“”:除了我们8个,如果有人要加入还收吗？？
UID︰614
引用第1198樓國球旗於2009-05-12 18:46發表的“”:好喎！開始約腳未呀 [表情] [表情]
UID︰13239
UID︰8322
引用第1206樓火鳳凰於2009-05-12 18:53發表的“”:記得係呢度報名︰http://bbs.hkbff.net/read.php?tid=71387唔係到時八大龍頭簽名攞整，會員又搵整，不過唔記得報名…… [表情]
引用第1205樓weijian1988於2009-05-12 18:52發表的“”:arsenal 上线了
引用第1209樓weijian1988於2009-05-12 18:56發表的“”:差arsenal而已
UID︰8272
引用第1211樓•Brian•於2009-05-12 19:01發表的“”:卻克蘭係咪傷左?
UID︰7789
引用第4樓火鳳凰於2009-02-20 15:01發表的“”:不過如果要鼓勵放料既人將資訊放入資訊版的話，又會做成另一個爭議。大家已經習慣左係主版度搵資訊，如果要大家稍移玉步入去子版搵既話，大家都會唔習慣，反對聲音會不絕於耳。於是大家就諗到 ”every rule has an exception”，大家鍾意既 topic 就係 exception，唔鍾意既就放逐佢入去子版啦。大家其實知唔知 “every rule has an exception” 呢句野係要黎點用？呢句似是而非既說話係方便權貴人士唔需要導守規則。點解似是而非？唔知大家有冇聽過 exception paradox？http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_paradoxException paradox: if every rule has an exception, then there must be an exception to the rule that every rule has an exception.From the logical point of view, this can be taken as a proof that the sentence "every rule has an exception" is false - a simple example of a proof technique known as reductio ad absurdum. More formally,1. Every rule has an exception. (Statement)2. "Every rule has an exception" has an exception. (By 1)3. There exists some rule R without exception. (By 2)4. Since R is a rule, by the first statement it must have an exception. But by 3, it does not have an exception - a contradiction.呢句說話本身係 logically false，而 “every rule has an exception” 將會演變成 “there are two sets of rules, one for the prominent folks, one for the ordinary folks”。即係話我地有兩套法則，一套適用於權貴人士，另一套適用於普通人士。好多人可能會覺得我好多餘，有乜好嘈姐，以我係 yff 版打滾多年，就算繼續係主版出資訊都唔會有人敢話我，我都好大機會可以做特權人士，我根本唔需要遵守規則。但係大家係唔係想見到咁既情形出現？係唔係想見到「全部會員要遵守版規，除左火鳳凰…… 等等特權人士例外」？所以我覺得如果我可以咁做，就應該全部人都可以咁做。規則有問題就應該改規則，而唔係製造特權人士出黎，做成不公平。
