• 2500閱讀
  • 48回復

[英超]利物浦和曼聯為首的六支英超球會推動改革英格蘭足球的方案,包括英超參賽隊伍減至18隊、取消聯賽盃和社區盾 [復制鏈接]

上一主題 下一主題
在線羅力亞
發帖
173309
好友元
3110
閱讀權限
173426
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 45  發表于: 2020-10-16
Hearing EFL clubs don’t want to accept the PL’s £50m for L1+2 as it would ‘split the league’.

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
在線羅力亞
發帖
173309
好友元
3110
閱讀權限
173426
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 46  發表于: 2020-10-16

EFL rejects £50m Premier League offer and wants control over money
Unhappiness that Championship excluded from rescue package
Premier League offers hardship funding to second-tier clubs

English Football League clubs have rejected a £50m rescue package for League One and League Two after deeming the bailout inadequate and insist Championship clubs should be part of any deal.

The Premier League has in turn extended an offer of hardship funding to second-tier teams but, in a move that shows the depths to which relations with the EFL have fallen following the revelations of Project Big Picture, it is to make the offer to clubs directly, cutting out the EFL.

Following a heated shareholders meeting on Wednesday, the Premier League declared a willingness to consider means-tested loans to Championship clubs on top of a bailout for lower-league sides. Its move on Thursday makes the offer explicit, although the specifics of any funding offered remain unclear.

EFL clubs are uncomfortable with the Premier League excluding the Championship from the loans and grants package proposed and are unanimous in believing those teams must be part of any future conversation.

Clubs also believe the EFL and not the Premier League should dictate where any financial support goes, although there is an acknowledgment that most League One and League Two clubs are in greater peril than those in the Championship and would be the first to receive such help.


A Championship source stressed the EFL is “72 clubs, not 48” and acknowledged the EFL must continue dialogue with the Premier League to establish a sufficient financial package.

One League One chairman described the Premier League’s offer, which was £20m in grants and £30m placed in reserve to prevent any clubs from going bust, as “embarrassing, disgraceful and disingenuous”, adding that the deal was akin to giving a “starving child tidbits to survive”.

A statement from the EFL was more conciliatory, saying that “while EFL clubs are appreciative that a formal proposal has now been put forward, the conditional offer of £50m falls some way short” of its financial requirements.

Emphasising the solidarity among the clubs it said: “There was a strong consensus that any rescue package must meet the requirements of all 72 clubs before it can be considered in full … The EFL is keen to continue discussions with the Premier League to reach an agreeable solution.”

There is a general appreciation that the Project Big Picture proposal rejected by Premier League clubs on Wednesday, which was put forward by Manchester United and Liverpool, together with Rick Parry, the EFL chairman, containing a £250m bailout, was “one step too far” but clubs believe something closer to that package is required. Parry is understood to have EFL clubs’ unanimous backing, with many feeling he has sparked discussions on issues that had previously proven impossible.

The rejection of Project Big Picture was welcomed by some Premier League managers on Thursday, with Southampton’s Ralph Hasenhüttl saying: “It ends up in a league that maybe has one champion for the next nine years like in Germany or in Italy. For me, it’s boring, to be honest. What I like so much about the Premier League is that we have every two, three years a new champion. ‘A Leicester’ will never be possible with these changes.”

Several League One and League Two clubs believe they will have to turn to the government for urgent help to save “half a dozen clubs” from entering administration if the Premier League does not substantially increase their offer. Other topics of conversation in the Championship call included the re-introduction of being able to use five substitutes and they also raised the possibility of refusing to pay HMRC bills amid the absence of financial help but agreed that was not an option to pursue.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2020/oct/15/efl-clubs-to-reject-50m-premier-league-offer-and-demand-control-over-money-championship

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
在線羅力亞
發帖
173309
好友元
3110
閱讀權限
173426
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 47  發表于: 2020-10-17
https://sportsyeah.hk/2020/10/articles/footballfinance/34406/
總結:整個計劃重中之重,很明顯就是為少數豪門鞏固自身的地位,透過給予其他球隊不同的甜頭換取足夠支持。目前在英超層面,任何方案都必須獲得不少於全體三分之二球會(即14隊)贊成才能通過。從上面的分析來看,計劃在英超得到足夠票數支持的機會應該很低。不過,調整英格蘭各級球會間財務失衡的聲音從無間斷,而在目前疫情大量球會極度需要財務協助的情況下,筆者預期即使 Project Big Picture 不獲通過,不同持份者或會以計劃中部分提案作爲基礎,提出不同的改革方案以改變現狀。畢竟對一衆球隊而言,已經到達一個在不行動就等同坐以待斃的局面,爲了生存,不得不求變。

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
在線羅力亞
發帖
173309
好友元
3110
閱讀權限
173426
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 48  發表于: 2020-11-11
回 羅力亞 的帖子
羅力亞:EFL rejects £50m Premier League offer and wants control over money
Unhappiness that Championship excluded from rescue package
Premier League offers hardship funding to second-tier clubs
....... (2020-10-16 07:07) 

英格蘭足球聯會稱或有10間球會本月未能支薪

負責管理英冠、英甲及英乙的英格蘭足球聯會表示,多達10間球會今個月可能無法支付工資,希望盡快與英超達成救助協議。英超上月曾經向管理英冠、英甲及英乙的英格蘭足球聯會建議,推出總值5000萬鎊的資助及免息貸款計劃,但對象只有英甲及英乙,不包括英冠的24支球隊,結果被英格蘭足球聯會批評是分化,拒絕建議。英格蘭足球聯會主席帕里說,據他們了解,有10間球會今個月很有機會未能支薪給職球員,期望再次與英超商討援助方案,又聲稱英超願意繼續磋商。

2020-11-11 06:36:41

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005