[英超]曼城以6,500萬歐元買斷畢爾巴中堅拿樸迪（Aymeric Laporte），簽約至2023年 [復制鏈接]

Man City in talks to sign Aymeric Laporte from Athletic Bilbao
By Sky Sports News
Last Updated: 23/01/18 5:24pm



Manchester City are in talks to sign Athletic Bilbao defender Aymeric Laporte, Sky Sports News understands.

According to Sky in Italy, Pep Guardiola and City are considering paying the £60m needed to trigger the France international's release clause.

City are in the market for a new centre-back in the January window and it is understood negotiations between the two clubs are continuing on Tuesday afternoon.

The 23-year old turned down a move to City when Guardiola first arrived at the club in 2016, and he has reportedly been of interest to a number of top clubs across Europe including Barcelona, Manchester United and Chelsea.

He has emerged as a top target for City, who have also shown interest in West Brom's Jonny Evans, Real Sociedad's Inigo Martinez and Leicester defender Harry Maguire.

Sky Sports News reported on Monday that Evans, who is also a target for Arsenal, has a release clause of just £3m should the Baggies be relegated.

City have funds in reserve after missing out on Alexis Sanchez, whom they were ready to pay £20m for, to Manchester United this month.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/11219662/man-city-in-talks-to-sign-aymeric-laporte-from-athletic-bilbao

羅力亞:球會唔想賣，球員又執意要走
Laporte其實唔算以上case[表情]
....... (2018-01-30 16:41) 

其實事實係點無人知。


宜家個情況就係，畢爾巴「表面上」唔打算賣。但球員有買斷條約。所以曼城連傾都費時傾，即刻就比個買斷價出黎。於是畢爾巴「被迫」要放走個球員。

係呢個層面睇，你完全正確。因為曼城既然係以BUY OUT CLAUSE 去完成個交易，咁佢當然係無「講價既空間」。因為買斷條款都無得講價既。



但係咪代表ALAN 既講法就唔成立呢？又唔一定喎！因為ALAN 就係認為，曼城試都唔試下同人講價，就即刻用買斷條款去完成個交易（當然，時間上亦唔多容許佢去講價，得番個一兩日）。好「豪氣」。咁事實上，曼城又真係好豪氣喎！試諗下，如果買家係雲爺爺，件事會變成點？我相信就算得算兩日，教授都會諗盡辦法去講平幾m，唔會因為趕時間就放棄佢講價既興趣。話之最尾買唔成都好，都一定要盡力去講左價先。

咁係呢個層面睇，alan 話曼城「豪氣」，亦無不妥當喎。

羅力亞:其實係講緊有約要買斷既情況
球隊等錢使所以可以平過buy out clause 賣
根本兩個case黎(我理解)[表情]
....... (2018-01-30 17:57) 

其實應該咁講，你就純粹就呢單CASE 去解釋個交易。ALAN 其實係講緊一般情況。你兩個人講既根本唔係同一個層次既野，係無衝突的。


你英文當然唔差啦，不過中文可能差D。

Gabriel:release既意義都係咁，兩者運作上有啲唔同，連帶影響都有唔同，背後原因睇番資料就係因為國家與國家之間法例上既差異
buy-out, literally就係買斷，意旨球員買斷份合約
....... (2018-01-31 10:50) 

不過我記得果陣阿蘇既4001萬事件，阿仙奴個bid都俾人reject左

其中除左可能阿蘇份contract既release clause唔係exactly 4000萬, 又或者可能release clause既運作同我地普遍既理解有少少唔同都未定

羅力亞:其實係講緊有約要買斷既情況
球隊等錢使所以可以平過buy out clause 賣
根本兩個case黎(我理解)[表情]
....... (2018-01-30 17:57) 

可信性最高既我淨係諗到火兄咋

不過如果唔tag火兄, 應該難啲見到佢留言

Alan0502:buy out clause呢個條款只係保證球會覺得個球員值呢個價而唔會比人低價買走而已 (2018-01-30 17:00)

release既意義都係咁，兩者運作上有啲唔同，連帶影響都有唔同，背後原因睇番資料就係因為國家與國家之間法例上既差異


buy-out, literally就係買斷，意旨球員買斷份合約



參照上面羅版既資料，兩個clauses既其中一個最大分別就係：buy-out係球員trigger (球員買斷自己份約)，release係買方球會trigger

兩者都係簽署合約時就定明好的，所以大家講既neymar就係用buy-out clause，PSG俾左錢Neymar (可能應該多過buy-out clause? 因為唔排除呢筆收入要俾稅俾西班牙政府，當中實牽涉好多複雜既法律性條文)，Neymar再自行buy out自己份contract

Pep Guardiola
Man City spending by position:

£55.8m - Goalkeepers
£233.1m - Defenders
£114.4m - Midfielders
£49.1m - Forwards
. https://t.co/1jMUWjMBed

Signed up till 2023! @ManCity complete signing of Aymwric Laporte from Athletic Bilbao.

其實係講緊有約要買斷既情況
球隊等錢使所以可以平過buy out clause 賣
根本兩個case黎(我理解)


可能我英文差一路都理解錯
不過資料我就po左
以後依d技術性問題
希望有高手解答下la

freezefox:你講呢個情況係當球會唔想賣，球員又執意要走。只要有球會肯比買斷價，咁就唔駛同原球會講，即比即買。原球會無SAY 。
....... (2018-01-30 15:32) 

我都理解到係咁

hokachitin:尼馬個兩億係咪就係 buy-out price? 我記得好似psg比兩億佢，佢自己再比巴塞 (2018-01-30 17:34) 

yes

尼馬個兩億係咪就係 buy-out price? 我記得好似psg比兩億佢，佢自己再比巴塞

畢仔好似買恩尼高馬天尼斯

羅力亞:Difference between buy-out and release clauses
A release clause, simply put, is a clause in a player’s contract which automatically requires a club (subject to qualifying conditions dependent on each individual contract, such as non-participation in the Cham .. (2018-01-30 16:52) 

buy out clause呢個條款只係保證球會覺得個球員值呢個價而唔會比人低價買走而已