• 1509閱讀
  • 26回復

[其他聯賽]樸茨茅夫下一賽季可能會被扣分 [復制鏈接]

上一主題 下一主題
離線ab34
 
發帖
17725
好友元
0
閱讀權限
17729
貢獻值
0
只看樓主 倒序閱讀 使用道具 樓主   發表于: 2010-07-15
Portsmouth face points penalty if taxman appeals


Beleaguered Portsmouth face starting the 2010-11 season with another huge points penalty with the taxman almost certain to appeal the Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) that was agreed last month.

Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has until Thursday evening to lodge an official appeal against the CVA which was passed on June 15. Under the terms of that CVA, 75% of the creditors agreed to 20p in the pound being repaid. That appears unacceptable to the taxman.

It has also been reported that HMRC is contesting the amount Portsmouth claim to owe, believing the debt to be £34 million and not £27 million as detailed in the club's accounts. The figure in the accounts enabled Pompey to agree the CVA, but if the figure is £34 million then HMRC hold more than 25% of the club's debt, meaning they can veto any CVA.

It appears highly unlikely HMRC would ever be offered more than 20p in the pound, making the aims of their appeal confusing. A 17-point deduction would make the club even more unattractive to prospective buyers, placing the club's future once more in doubt. If the club goes bust then HMRC would be left with nothing.

With the appeal unlikely to be heard until October at the earliest, it means Portsmouth will be unable to start the season with an agreed CVA in place. Under normal Football League rules this would lead to a points deduction, with a 17-point penalty likely to be handed down.

In 2008-09, AFC Bournemouth, Luton Town and Rotherham United all started the League Two season on -17, while Leeds were deducted 15 points in League One in the previous season. The Football League considered that each club had not satisfactorily exited administration through an agreed CVA by the start of the season.

It remains to be seen whether or not any exception would be made for Portsmouth, but with the Football League's hard line regarding insolvency matters, it appears extremely unlikely.

What is certain is that Portsmouth will remain under a transfer embargo, meaning they will be unable to sign any new players before the kick-off on August 7 or before the transfer window closes on August 31. New manager Steve Cotterill will have to work with a threadbare squad until the matter is resolved.

Administrator Andrew Andronikou told the Portsmouth News: "We believe the HMRC are going to appeal. That is the indication we are getting. It's going to be an irritant and, to put it simply, the embargo will stay for a longer period.

"As long as there is an appeal process, the registration embargo will continue to be in force for the foreseeable future. However, we expect any appeal hearing to be held in October or November. Before then, if the squad is below 20, we can still bring in players, regardless of the embargo. That is allowed and is something we are looking at.

"There are a few players who have been around the club for a while we are looking to release. They earn £2,000-3,000 a week, so what is the point of having them here if they are not going to play for the club? There is no point whatsoever."

Portsmouth have been under a transfer embargo since October 15 last year.

Pape Bouba Diop, Tal Ben-Haim, Kevin-Prince and John Utaka will all be offloaded shortly, and only when Pompey's first-team squad dips below 20 players can they apply for special dispensation to make a signing.

"[Portsmouth Football Club] have offered 20p in the pound to creditors, which we don't regard as an acceptable return to the taxpayer. We are determined to achieve a decent return to the taxpayer," an HMRC source told Accountancy Age last month.

HMRC is also taking action over the "football creditors rule", which places the taxman below football clubs and players when a club is in administration. The rule insists football debts must be paid in full while the taxman is forced to join the back of the queue with all the other creditors.



http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=808689&sec=england&cc=4716
離線國球旗
發帖
206118
好友元
100
閱讀權限
206118
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 1  發表于: 2010-07-15
陰公
離線OldSosad
發帖
35849
好友元
13630
閱讀權限
107848
貢獻值
7
只看該作者 2  發表于: 2010-07-15
又扣 ....... sosad
離線Gabriel
發帖
28309
好友元
30039
閱讀權限
28309
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 3  發表于: 2010-07-15
永不超生....
離線ab34
發帖
17725
好友元
0
閱讀權限
17729
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 4  發表于: 2010-07-15
扣完又扣
離線HINNNS
發帖
29064
好友元
0
閱讀權限
29064
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 5  發表于: 2010-07-15
睇黎呢幾年都唔洗再見到樸茅
離線呀威
發帖
40490
好友元
34302
閱讀權限
40490
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 6  發表于: 2010-07-15
又扣
離線KeL
發帖
65987
好友元
6345
閱讀權限
65998
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 7  發表于: 2010-07-15
又再扣分
發帖
7034
好友元
0
閱讀權限
7035
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 8  發表于: 2010-07-15
最惨系班球员
離線leefish
發帖
8327
好友元
460
閱讀權限
8327
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 9  發表于: 2010-07-15
係咪要負20分呀??
咁咪姐係又唔洗踢??
佢地犯左咩事呀??
發帖
7034
好友元
0
閱讀權限
7035
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 10  發表于: 2010-07-15
引用第9樓leefish2010-07-15 02:00發表的“”:
係咪要負20分呀??
咁咪姐係又唔洗踢??
佢地犯左咩事呀??

财政问题,球员没粮出
離線Valencia25
發帖
22686
好友元
10234
閱讀權限
22751
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 11  發表于: 2010-07-15
又扣
離線可可粉
發帖
58113
好友元
352539
閱讀權限
58232
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 12  發表于: 2010-07-15
又要扣
離線杜菲斯
發帖
37255
好友元
0
閱讀權限
37259
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 13  發表于: 2010-07-15
扣完又扣
離線xo883
發帖
11375
好友元
12470
閱讀權限
11375
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 14  發表于: 2010-07-15
當年列斯係咪都係-20?