• 2961閱讀
  • 46回復

[英超]Rooney有機會面臨停賽3場(冇事了) [復制鏈接]

上一主題 下一主題
發帖
23737
好友元
94451
閱讀權限
23737
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 30  發表于: 2011-02-28
在線freezefox
發帖
161236
好友元
362182
閱讀權限
260878
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 31  發表于: 2011-02-28
引用第23樓火鳳凰2011-02-28 21:13發表的“”:
[表情]







YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
在線freezefox
發帖
161236
好友元
362182
閱讀權限
260878
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 32  發表于: 2011-02-28
呢個topic既發展大概可以想像到了  


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
發帖
7323
好友元
3409
閱讀權限
27570
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 33  發表于: 2011-02-28
引用第27樓軒軒~阿B2011-02-28 22:04發表的“”:
又有位入 [表情] [表情] [表情]

離線Gabriel
發帖
28309
好友元
30039
閱讀權限
28309
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 34  發表于: 2011-02-28
However, the disciplinary process is complex in the sense that the FA are not allowed by FIFA to take further action on incidents already dealt with by the referee.

夠啦夠啦
在線freezefox
發帖
161236
好友元
362182
閱讀權限
260878
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 35  發表于: 2011-02-28
引用第34樓Gabriel2011-02-28 22:48發表的“”:
However, the disciplinary process is complex in the sense that the FA are not allowed by FIFA to take further action on incidents already dealt with by the referee.
[表情] 夠啦夠啦



即係同保辛華事件一樣,球證係報告到係話佢睇到成件事啦


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線g3rMan
發帖
56229
好友元
6575
閱讀權限
57395
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 36  發表于: 2011-02-28
朗尼「鬆踭」 英足總不予追究

英格蘭足總決定,對朗尼上場聯賽「鬆踭」一事不予追究。

By Coody Yuen

2011年2月28日 下午10:47:00

在曼聯作客四比零大勝韋根一戰,朗尼被鏡頭捕捉到曾對韋根中場占士麥卡菲「批踭」,令人擔心他是否會被「秋後算帳」。不過,曼聯上下及紅魔球迷大可放下心頭大石了,因為英格蘭足總已決定不會對此事作出追究。

根據英格蘭足總自己所訂的球例,只要球証清楚看到了犯規動作,並作出了判決,他們是不能「秋後算帳」的。就朗尼侵犯對手一事,當時的球証明顯地看到了該廿五歲前鋒的「起踭」動作,並已即時判韋根一記自由球,因為英格蘭足球不能再增添任何懲罰。

當時的執法球証向英格蘭足總表示自己已作出了適當的判決,不過,明顯地,韋根領隊馬天尼斯認為一記罰球的處罰對朗尼這個充滿殺傷力的動作是絕對「不足夠」。

(Goal.com)
離線him
發帖
23061
好友元
97
閱讀權限
23061
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 37  發表于: 2011-03-01
英足總由上至下都係曼聯既人 點會有事呀
離線太伊
發帖
22732
好友元
1
閱讀權限
22732
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 38  發表于: 2011-03-01

痴線佢個位根本睇唔到朗尼起 月爭 …
真係有名氣就大晒
發帖
67977
好友元
0
閱讀權限
67977
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 39  發表于: 2011-03-01
"the FA have been told the official feels he administered the appropriate action"

you win
離線亨利仔
發帖
51266
好友元
2834
閱讀權限
51266
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 40  發表于: 2011-03-01
幾時都話足總最英明
發帖
35706
好友元
9895
閱讀權限
35710
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 41  發表于: 2011-03-01
甘都無事,真係無天理!!!!  
∼縱使我們選擇不了出生的環境,決定不了生命的長度,卻能憑著一顆虔誠向善的心,讓自己活出了生命的深度。∼

離線朗尼
發帖
70130
好友元
15
閱讀權限
70131
貢獻值
3
只看該作者 42  發表于: 2011-03-01
引用第41樓sakura_32120042011-03-01 10:36發表的“”:
甘都無事,真係無天理!!!!   [表情] [表情] [表情] [表情]



發帖
7122
好友元
755
閱讀權限
26949
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 43  發表于: 2011-03-01
Whelan: Refs 'afraid' of United

Wigan chairman Dave Whelan has claimed some referees "seem to be afraid of applying the law to Manchester United" after Wayne Rooney escaped a ban for his elbow on James McCarthy.

Referee Mark Clattenburg awarded a free-kick to Wigan following the incident, which Wigan boss Roberto Martinez felt "quite clearly" warranted a red card.

Although Clattenburg would have had to have admitted he did not see the incident, many had expected that Rooney would be punished retrospectively, and the Daily Telegraph reports that United "were so resigned to Wayne Rooney being charged ... they had explored possible loopholes to spare the 25 year-old from a ban".

Whelan, whose side were beaten 4-0 at the DW Stadium, said he felt Rooney's escape was unjustifiable.

"I cannot understand how the FA can say there will be no further action," he told the Daily Telegraph. "Manchester United is a great club and Fergie is just simply the best manager, but it is the referees who seem to be afraid of applying the law to United and I don't know why.

"Man United get treated a little bit differently to the rest of the football clubs. I wish they would treat Wigan like that. I wish we could get away with certain things that Man United get away with.

"Mark Clattenburg is usually a very good referee. I could not believe that he [Rooney] was not sent off. Had it been one of our players, he would have walked.

"Rooney was only ten yards from the referee and it was a deliberate elbow. It was the swipe of an elbow right across the head and a clear sending-off offence."

He added in The Sun: "Something is wrong when a top international like Rooney is seen doing something like this, as clear as day, and is allowed to get away without being punished.

"If it was any other club or player, you can bet your life he would have been sent off, but officials seem intimidated by the words 'Rooney' and 'United'. Manchester United are allowed to get away with things the rest of us get pulled up for, and you can't have one set of rules for one club and another for the rest.

"I don't care what the FA say about the matter being dealt with at the time by us getting a free-kick. They, and everyone else in football, know justice isn't being served here.

"The FA will be delighted they can hide behind their rules and let Rooney off, as they are frightened of taking sanctions against him and his club."

In the wake of the news that Rooney had escaped a ban on Monday, Professional Game Match Officials general manager Mike Riley defended Clattenburg.

"Mark took the correct course of action with this incident," he said. "Match officials are trained to prioritise following the ball, as that's where the greater majority of incidents are going to take place. However, we also do a lot of work around the area of peripheral vision to be aware of anything that might potentially happen off the ball.

"In this incident Mark was following play but caught sight of two players coming together and he awarded a free-kick because he believed one player had impeded the other.

"We should be clear that Mark did nothing wrong in officiating this incident as he acted on what he saw on the pitch.''

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story/_/id/887476/dave-whelan-claims-double-standards-over-wayne-rooney-escape?cc=4716
離線火鳳凰
發帖
91264
好友元
54168
閱讀權限
91264
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 44  發表于: 2011-03-01
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-united/8354071/Chelsea-v-Manchester-United-how-did-Wayne-Rooney-avoid-FA-punishment-for-elbowing-James-McCarthy.html

Fifa have made it clear to national associations that the referee is in charge of the 90 minutes on the pitch. The FA cannot overrule the decision of a referee in the match unless he or she admits to making a mistake.

Clattenburg insisted to the FA, he saw Rooney’s clash with McCarthy and dealt with it at the time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaIHfykVdiU

clattenburg 好野,再睇返都覺得自己當時無判錯……