大家唔好又罵戰啦，不如睇清楚 fa 個 115頁 report 了解整件事
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/premiership/suarez-case-reflects-badly-on-liverpool-16098087.htmlIn interview, the defender translated negro as the French negre, which translates as both "negro" and "nigger". But the insulting and abusive reference to the colour of a player's skin is still outlawed under the FA's Rule E3(1) for good reason and it has been in their hapless effort to get their story straight on this issue that Liverpool have embarrassed themselves.
There was an attempt to get some facts out that afternoon at Anfield, although it proved to be a fateful enterprise. The commission's report lays out that Liverpool's director of football, Damien Comolli, an accomplished linguist, realised the gravity of the accusation against Suarez, questioned him in Spanish and then related to Marriner the Uruguayan's story of how, after Evra had said, "Don't touch me, South American", Suarez had replied, "Por que, tu eres negro?" (Why, because you are black?) – words corroborated by Dalglish and Dirk Kuyt. Comolli actually spelt out the Spanish to Dowd, Marriner's designated note-taker, though did not appeared to realise that this aggressive allusion to a player's skin colour might be a breach of Rule E3(1).
Perhaps Suarez did, because he subsequently claimed his response to Evra had merely been "por que negro?" (why, black?) positing "negro" as a colloquial Uruguayan Spanish term of affection. When the discrepancies between Suarez and his colleagues' witness statements became apparent, Liverpool clearly realised they had a problem and stories started changing. Suarez claimed a "misunderstanding" on the parts of both Comolli and Kuyt, who agreed that yes, of course, there must have been one. But the commission saw right through that and deemed Suarez's claims that "negro" was a term of such affection that he used it on team-mate Glen Johnson equally hollow.
The commission's commendably exhaustive work included the use of Manchester University linguistics experts to show that colloquial "negro" is equally likely to be a malign term.
In the absence of video to lip-read from, it also analysed the players' body language at moments crucial to the case. There was no endearment about the way Suarez used "negro" – and no evidence that Evra had said "South American" in the first place. The Uruguayan's reliability as a witness collapsed and, in a case which pitted Evra's word against his, the remainder of the Frenchman's accusations were found to be valid.
大家既爭論點係 negro 呢個字眼到底係善意定係有意針對皮膚顏色，fa 話當中最關鍵就係 "Por que, tu eres negro?" (Why, because you are black?) 呢句，當初 Comolli (liverpool's director of football), daglish, kuyt 都同意 suarez 講過呢句，comolli 仲成句 spanish 串出黎俾 dowd 聽(當日第四球證)。呢個證供同 evra 果邊講既完全吻合。
不過後來唔知係唔係覺得唔妥，suarez 就話只係講左句"por que negro?" (why, black?)，negro 只係一個善意的稱呼，而當日 comolli, kuyt 只係誤會左佢既講法。因為利記內部前言不對後語，而另一面就好一致，所以 fa 選擇相信 evra 的一方。
不過我個人就唔係好同意呢句係好嚴重，我覺得只係普通既侮辱，亦覺得罰八場實在太多，兩、三場可能比較適合，不過呢方面可能我既睇法同外國人好唔同。
