• 2268閱讀
  • 42回復

[英超]英足總宣布車路士前鋒托利斯將不會被罰額外停賽 [復制鏈接]

上一主題 下一主題
離線羅力亞
 
發帖
172620
好友元
3265
閱讀權限
172737
貢獻值
0
只看樓主 倒序閱讀 使用道具 樓主   發表于: 2013-09-30
Chelsea's Torres facing four-match ban over 'gouging' attack on Jan Vertonghen
Striker already suspended for one match for unrelated red card poised to be the first victim of the FA's new video panel





Chelsea's fury over Fernando Torres' White Hart Lane red card is set to explode when they learn the striker is facing a FOUR match ban.
Blues manager Jose Mourinho accused Tottenham's Jan Vertonghen of conning ref Mike Dean by staying down and implying he had been
elbowed by Torres in an aerial challenge that saw Dean show the Spaniard his second yellow card.


But Torres is now poised to fall foul of FA beaks over his initial spat with Vertonghen during Saturday's 1-1 draw,
in which he appeared to scratch and scrape at the defender's face. Despite the video evidence showing there was no contact with the Belgian's face
in the incident that sparked his dismissal, Torres has no right of appeal under FA rules.
However, he now faces a further disciplinary charge and becoming the first player judged by the Premier League
and FA's new video panel of former referees over the first flashpoint.


Wembley chiefs will contact Dean on Monday to ask him to explain Torres' first yellow card.
The whsitler is understood to be ready to report that he booked Torres for a trip on Vertonghen, and not for the altercation which followed,
which he will insist he did not see.If that is so, the FA will refer the incident to the video panel,
and if all three ex-referees agree that it represented violent conduct, Torres will receive an automatic extra three games.
That would rule him out of the west Londoners' league meetings with Cardiff and Manchester City
and the Capital One Cup trip to Arsenal, in addition to next week's game at Norwich.


Mourinho backed Dean after Saturday's game, insisting he had made an "honest" mistake and that Vertonghen was the "guilty" party.
The Special One boss said: "The referee trusted the player. When he saw him pretending there had been a violent action he took a normal decision.
It was a bad one but the player didn't help the referee."But Chelsea will doubtless feel victimised if Torres suffers from football's version of double jeopardy,
and Mourinho's view of the official is unlikely to be as supportive.


http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/chelseas-torres-facing-four-match-ban-2320095
[ 此帖被羅力亞在2013-10-01 22:15重新編輯 ]
1條評分好友元+1000
呀威 好友元 +1000 發帖獎勵 2013-10-03

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線羅力亞
發帖
172620
好友元
3265
閱讀權限
172737
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 1  發表于: 2013-09-30
第一張黃牌有手尾跟

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線HINNNS
發帖
29064
好友元
0
閱讀權限
29064
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 2  發表于: 2013-09-30
足總玩哂佢啦不如
離線freezefox
發帖
160132
好友元
326572
閱讀權限
259774
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 3  發表于: 2013-09-30
無睇場波,其實發生咩事?


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線siuzac
發帖
11212
好友元
418035
閱讀權限
11212
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 4  發表于: 2013-09-30
咁維頓漢推王子去廣告牌有無手尾跟?
同埋臨尾係地典下典下, 唔講以為爆面爆頭爆眼有無手尾跟?
離線麻凡
發帖
35940
好友元
3414
閱讀權限
35941
貢獻值
10
只看該作者 5  發表于: 2013-09-30
回 freezefox 的帖子
freezefox:無睇場波,其實發生咩事? (2013-09-30 11:54) 

抽水, 吹罰後, 兩條友互相"大聲理論", 同時間兩人都手向前揮來揮去配合語氣, 本來平常到不得了, 但廢托隻手揮揮下卻突然輕拍人塊面, 再配個微笑, 其他人睇唔清楚都覺得佢係理論完後的友好動作, 但睇返慢鏡, 就會見到原來佢係人塊面起勢咁搞, 即係而家頭POST張相咁.............好肉酸囉~~~
離線國球旗
發帖
206122
好友元
120
閱讀權限
206122
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 6  發表于: 2013-09-30
回 siuzac 的帖子
siuzac:咁維頓漢推王子去廣告牌有無手尾跟?[表情]
同埋臨尾係地典下典下, 唔講以為爆面爆頭爆眼有無手尾跟?[表情] [表情]  (2013-09-30 12:14) 

足總:球證當時已經睇到,無罰所以無野跟進。
離線Rafer
發帖
6222
好友元
95
閱讀權限
6222
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 7  發表于: 2013-09-30
離線siuzac
發帖
11212
好友元
418035
閱讀權限
11212
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 8  發表于: 2013-09-30
回 國球旗 的帖子
國球旗:足總:球證當時已經睇到,無罰所以無野跟進。[表情] (2013-09-30 12:15) 

離線siuzac
發帖
11212
好友元
418035
閱讀權限
11212
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 9  發表于: 2013-09-30
王子呢下抵罰.手多.

但公平D講.維頓漢D動作都唔少.

足總要凈係罰王子. 遠在香港既小球迷又可以點.
離線火鳳凰
發帖
91264
好友元
54168
閱讀權限
91264
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 10  發表于: 2013-09-30
回 siuzac 的帖子
siuzac:咁維頓漢推王子去廣告牌有無手尾跟?[表情]
同埋臨尾係地典下典下, 唔講以為爆面爆頭爆眼有無手尾跟?[表情] [表情] (2013-09-30 12:14)

兩個都係黃牌動作,根據現時球例,黃牌無論無俾定係俾錯都係唔會秋後算帳的,除非係認錯人……
離線麻凡
發帖
35940
好友元
3414
閱讀權限
35941
貢獻值
10
只看該作者 11  發表于: 2013-09-30
回 siuzac 的帖子
siuzac:王子呢下抵罰.手多.
但公平D講.維頓漢D動作都唔少.
足總要凈係罰王子. 遠在香港既小球迷又可以點.[表情] (2013-09-30 12:18) 

即係咁, 足球呢D咁熱血運動, 擺明車馬開拖大家唔覺咩, 可能費托真係一巴車埋去, 足總未必有野講, 但陰濕呢家野呢, 足總唔做野, 傳媒都煲到佢地要開FILE為止啦~~~
離線羅力亞
發帖
172620
好友元
3265
閱讀權限
172737
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 12  發表于: 2013-09-30
其實一日未判都未知結果既.........
不過依個video panel係今年新加的
班人開季咁耐都未開齋,仲唔揾Torres祭旗咩.....

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線謝拉傑
發帖
52607
好友元
29951
閱讀權限
52608
貢獻值
4
只看該作者 13  發表于: 2013-09-30
回 freezefox 的帖子
freezefox:無睇場波,其實發生咩事? (2013-09-30 11:54) 

You To Be 幫到你。

@freezefox  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odyBvydC7UQ
本帖提到的人: @freezefox
離線freezefox
發帖
160132
好友元
326572
閱讀權限
259774
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 14  發表于: 2013-09-30
回 謝拉傑 的帖子
謝拉傑:You To Be 幫到你。
@freezefox    
....... (2013-09-30 12:40) 

疑?維頓漢郁手先架喎。
本帖提到的人: @freezefox


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!