• 9774閱讀
  • 397回復

[英超]修咸頓後衛雲迪積克(Virgil van Dijk)向球會遞交轉會申請 [復制鏈接]

上一主題 下一主題
離線freezefox
發帖
160135
好友元
326587
閱讀權限
259777
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 300  發表于: 2017-06-09
回 posouth 的帖子
posouth:續集了.... [表情]  (2017-06-09 08:51) 

第三集應該好快會有預告。


片名係「雲迪積克的復仇計劃」!


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線freezefox
發帖
160135
好友元
326587
閱讀權限
259777
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 301  發表于: 2017-06-09
回 羅力亞 的帖子
羅力亞:曼城都唔儍既,減價先啦[表情]  (2017-06-09 08:55) 

尋日我先係個WHATSAPP 群組到講,曼城實壓你價!


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線羅力亞
發帖
172652
好友元
3650
閱讀權限
172769
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 302  發表于: 2017-06-09
回 posouth 的帖子
posouth:唔好笑哂住喇, 又有新發展了. 修咸頓好大機會被中國財團Lander收購!!
http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11700/10909127/lander-holdings-close-to-agreeing-southampton-takeover-deal  (2017-06-09 09:13) 

http://bbs.hkbff.net/read.php?tid=125852


YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線Gabriel
發帖
28309
好友元
30039
閱讀權限
28309
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 303  發表于: 2017-06-09
原來吹到咁大都係為賣盤賣多啲

唔怪得咁惡
離線Seefood
發帖
26870
好友元
43
閱讀權限
26890
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 304  發表于: 2017-06-09
好睇過tbb
離線羅力亞
發帖
172652
好友元
3650
閱讀權限
172769
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 305  發表于: 2017-06-09
回 Seefood 的帖子
Seefood:好睇過tbb[表情]  (2017-06-09 10:53) 



Virgil van Dijk‏Verified account @VirgilvDijk  15h15 hours ago

💭

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線freezefox
發帖
160135
好友元
326587
閱讀權限
259777
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 306  發表于: 2017-06-09
回 Gabriel 的帖子
Gabriel:原來吹到咁大都係為賣盤賣多啲[表情]
唔怪得咁惡[表情]  (2017-06-09 10:44) 

咁六千萬相對二億,咁就梗係二億緊要D 啦。



呢鋪擺到明係利物浦被人冼鑊甘既,仲要比人擺上檯。真係慘呀!


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線加歷查
發帖
42970
好友元
88
閱讀權限
42970
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 307  發表于: 2017-06-09
回 ryan_kewell_7 的帖子
ryan_kewell_7:我路過架咋, 準備深潛番落去[表情] (2017-06-09 01:09) 

會長
離線羅力亞
發帖
172652
好友元
3650
閱讀權限
172769
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 308  發表于: 2017-06-09
Southampton stand firm over Virgil van Dijk following Liverpool interest

Jeremy Wilson, deputy football correspondent, chris bascombe
8 JUNE 2017 • 10:30PM
Southampton have told Virgil van Dijk that he is not for sale this summer and believe that their complaint over Liverpool’s conduct – which may still result in a formal Premier League investigation – has shown how serious they are about their stance.

Liverpool were ready to pay a world-record £60 million fee for a defender for Van Dijk but Southampton were infuriated by stories suggesting that he wanted to join them and ultimately forced a public apology and promise from Liverpool that they would not pursue the player.

Van Dijk is only one season into a six-year deal and, amid interest also from Arsenal, Manchester City and Chelsea, Southampton have made it clear that they now expect their captain to return focused for pre-season following the injury that has sidelined him since January.

The Premier League is awaiting observations from Liverpool and Southampton before deciding whether any action will be taken over the south coast club’s demand for an investigation into whether there had been an illegal approach. Liverpool do not expect to know for certain if they will be in the clear until next week.

Southampton have sold star players in each of the previous three summers and, while offers in the region of £70 million may cause a reappraisal, now believe that he will stay.

Southampton are likely to be satisfied with the fulsome apology they received on Wednesday night but they have not dropped their complaint and believe that it is now for the Premier League to decide what should happen. The League theoretically has a range of disciplinary sanctions open to it if a club are found to have ‘tapped up’ another player.

Liverpool and Southampton officials had the chance to come face-to-face at the Premier League’s board meeting held in Harrogate on Thursday, on what was sure to have been an uncomfortable debut for the Anfield club’s new chief executive, Peter Moore.

A high level Anfield delegation accompanied Moore, as Liverpool’s principal owner, John W Henry, and chairman, Tom Werner, were also in attendance. That is not usual, but it was pre-planned rather than a consequence of recent events.

Their presence was more likely to have been a result of the argument regarding overseas TV rights. Liverpool determined to push for a greater market share of broadcast revenue as they believe the price paid by customers abroad is based on the attractiveness of the biggest clubs. It is understood that the Van Dijk situation did not come up and relations between Liverpool and Southampton were cordial.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/06/08/southampton-stand-firm-virgil-van-dijk-following-liverpool-interest/


YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線Gabriel
發帖
28309
好友元
30039
閱讀權限
28309
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 309  發表于: 2017-06-09
回 freezefox 的帖子
freezefox:咁六千萬相對二億,咁就梗係二億緊要D 啦。
....... (2017-06-09 11:00) 

係好無辜

唔知使唔使俾人罰
離線羅力亞
發帖
172652
好友元
3650
閱讀權限
172769
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 310  發表于: 2017-06-11
COULD LIVERPOOL STILL SIGN VAN DIJK?

Stuart Pearce says Southampton defender Virgil van Dijk could still end up at Liverpool this summer, despite insisting this week they have ended their interest.

“I still at this moment in time wouldn’t rule Liverpool out. If they meet Southampton’s valuation I think they will shake hands, say they’ve got a good deal out of it and sanction the player to go.”


YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線羅力亞
發帖
172652
好友元
3650
閱讀權限
172769
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 311  發表于: 2017-06-11
Independent Sport ✔ @IndoSport
Chelsea might now also be accused of making an illegal approach for Virgil van Dijk: http://indo.ie/nhak30ctSEW  #CFC @RealKevinPalmer

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線posouth
發帖
27686
好友元
127728
閱讀權限
27706
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 312  發表于: 2017-06-11
回 羅力亞 的帖子
羅力亞:Independent Sport ✔ @IndoSport
Chelsea might now also be accused of making an illegal approach for Virgil van Dijk: http://indo.ie/nhak30ctSEW  #CFC @RealKevinPalmer [表情]  (2017-06-11 01:50) 

咁都得......結果原來VVD係出黎放蛇, 捉哂你地班奸仔大球會    
Miss you James and Bobby! Thank you for the years of great memories!!
離線羅力亞
發帖
172652
好友元
3650
閱讀權限
172769
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 313  發表于: 2017-06-12
Manchester City have no intention of reviving their pursuit of Virgil van Dijk, now Liverpool have dropped out of the race. (Source: Mirror) https://t.co/MTOSO1vCdC

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005
離線羅力亞
發帖
172652
好友元
3650
閱讀權限
172769
貢獻值
0
只看該作者 314  發表于: 2017-06-23

YFF:12-13:499 13-14:217 14-15:215 Fantrax:15-16:3 16-17:20 17-18:3 18-19:18 19-20:7 21-22: 9 22-23: 3 FPL 2018-19:94638 2019-20:98734 2020-21:8005