UID︰8322
引用第20樓國球旗於2010-06-28 16:01發表的“”:始終都係果句，班 FIFA 全部都係垃圾。 [表情] [表情]
UID︰16108
引用第29樓丹尼屎於2010-06-28 16:22發表的“”:國際足協呢班老而不點會肯 [表情]
UID︰13091
引用第31樓呀威於2010-06-28 16:24發表的“”:要睇下FIFA 幾時受唔住外界言論，或者白禮達轉性
引用第30樓火鳳凰於2010-06-28 16:23發表的“”:FIFA？佢官網個 highlights 竟然可以 cut 左林伯果球「入球」，反而下半場既中楣波就有。.......
UID︰15657
UID︰12060
引用第16樓火鳳凰於2010-06-28 15:56發表的“”:nba 有用、tennis 有用、cricket 有用……就係全世界最受歡迎既體育死都唔肯用…… [表情] [表情]
引用第35樓ArSo於2010-06-28 17:41發表的“”:你搵足球同 nba tennis比?nba一分停一次 而且有timeouttennis 一球停一次.......
Blatter to blame for ‘goal’ claims Hawk-eye inventorPAUL HAWKINS, the inventor of Hawk-Eye, was blissfully unaware that the controversy over goal-line technology had just hit the stratosphere when called on his mobile phone at the end of the first half yesterday afternoon.Hawkins had intended to watch the match between Germany and England on television at his home in Winchester, but he and his wife got lost when out on a bike ride. The pair were pedalling home furiously when Frank Lampard’s 38th-minute shot clearly crossed the German line but wasn’t spotted by the Uruguayan referee Jorge Larrionda or his match officials.Even if he didn’t actually witness the ‘goal’ which would have pulled England back into the game at 2-2, the incident was a vindication of all the warnings Hawkins has been giving FIFA, and president Sepp Blatter, about their refusal to countenance goal-line technology.“I said last year it would probably take an incident in this World Cup to make them change their minds, and maybe England versus Germany is a big enough game to make them understand that football needs this technology,” pointed out Hawkins.Last September, infuriated by inaccurate statements being made by the Fifa president, Hawkins wrote an open letter to Blatter. In it he pointed out that Hawk-Eye had tested goal-line technology at the behest of the English Premier League, and it had been shown to work to the satisfaction of the International Football Association Board (IFAB).According to Hawkins his system, which is based on the same principles as those used by his company at Wimbledon, provides a match referee with a definitive beep in his earpiece within 0.5 seconds of an incident happening. The information is relayed so quickly that there is no need for the game to be stopped if the ball hasn’t crossed the line.Despite being fully aware of this, Blatter has continued to insist that the game would have to be stopped and that it would take five seconds for the information from Hawk-Eye to reach the referee.“He repeated his mis-information again at the FIFA Congress before the World Cup,” Hawkins said. “Yet he knows, and everybody else knows, that our technology is 100% accurate.”Hawkins knew he faced a major problem with Blatter when the FIFA president, along with his UEFA counterpart Michel Platini, had the testing of goal-line technology terminated at an IFAB meeting held at Gleneagles in 2008. That turnaround, opposed by the SFA, put technology on ice and eventually led to the introduction, at Platini’s behest, of extra goal-line officials in last season’s Europa League.Now, the clamour for technology to be introduced may be too much for FIFA, UEFA and their presidents to resist.“It would be wrong to say yesterday’s disallowed goal didn’t matter because Germany won 4-1,” maintained Hawkins. “The last two German goals were scored on the break. If the score had been 2-2, as it should have been, it would have been a different game.“I suppose it is ironic that this whole issue has been reignited by a game between Germany and England, but unlike Wembley in 1966 there is no dispute this time about whether the ball was over the line or not.”
引用第36樓火鳳凰於2010-06-28 17:48發表的“”:
引用第37樓ArSo於2010-06-28 17:49發表的“”:如果有守門柱既後衛衝入球門既球員完全唔影響嘛 [表情]
UID︰3824
引用第40樓tl9189於2010-06-28 18:01發表的“”:老實講入球呢d... 真係接受唔到誤判..就好似打winning 咁..過左白界, 就已經當入, 理得去龍門撲返出黎...我諗過白界得分, 係足球最基本既原則lor.. 如果下下誤判, 有乜好玩.........
UID︰34
