• 7023閱讀
  • 152回復

[英超][官網確認] 利物浦董事會同意賣盤~~ [復制鏈接]

上一主題 下一主題
離線迪克
發帖
42896
好友元
7088
閱讀權限
120318
貢獻值
14
只看該作者 60  發表于: 2010-10-07
引用第59樓TriFox2010-10-07 16:05發表的“”:
阿仙奴財政好差咩? [表情] [表情] [表情]

差呀~
雲加話廿年後先會有錢買星呀
只愛足球
離線leohmygod.
發帖
22158
好友元
955
閱讀權限
22158
貢獻值
1
只看該作者 61  發表于: 2010-10-07
引用第60樓迪克2010-10-07 17:16發表的“”:
差呀~
雲加話廿年後先會有錢買星呀 [表情] [表情] [表情]

所以而家買定20年後既星
離線廢托
發帖
54342
好友元
25264
閱讀權限
54342
貢獻值
6
只看該作者 62  發表于: 2010-10-07
好似平左d..
發帖
41012
好友元
29305
閱讀權限
66104
貢獻值
8
只看該作者 63  發表于: 2010-10-07
好似話兩個老細唔肯放喎
四星德國!!KING OF THE WORLD 2014

離線TriFox
發帖
18688
好友元
456246
閱讀權限
18695
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 64  發表于: 2010-10-08
Liverpool have confirmed that they have failed in their bid to have their High Court hearing on Friday and that the civil war with owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett is now scheduled for "early next week".

ESPNsoccernet understands that Liverpool applied for the the case to be fast-tracked through the High Court, but now are resigned to the matter being heard by as early as Tuesday as Liverpool's lawyers, Slaughter and May, seek to derail the American duo's attempts to block the £300 million sale to the owners of the Boston Red Sox.

Hicks and Gillett are plotting their own sale of the club to give them back their £144 million investment, and want the courts to block the takeover, which has been agreed by Martin Broughton over their heads.

One of the most fascinating civil wars in football history needs to be aired ahead of the October 15 deadline when the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) have the power to call in their £237 million debt.

Broughton is confident that Hicks and Gillett will not be successful in blocking the sale due to the written undertakings they made when handing over control of the club. Broughton says he was given the power to change the composition of the board and that efforts by the Americans to remove Ian Ayre and Christian Purslow, prior to the sale being announced, were not legitimate.

"I am confident we will prevail, but you can never be 100% when you go to court," Broughton said. "We will be seeking a judgment that we acted within our rights. They tried to remove Ian and Christian, and after taking legal advice I told them that was invalid.

"I think we'll get there, but I can't make a promise. If the case goes against us, we do have a fallback position, but we're not prepared to discuss this at present."

Hicks' New York-based spokesman, Mark Semer, has said that Broughton's claim that the sale cannot be blocked is false.

"There were no such undertakings given to Broughton. The board has been legally reconstituted, and the new board does not approve of this proposed transaction,'' Semer told Bloomberg News.

An attempted coup, which would have seen Hicks' son Mack and Lori McCuthcheon, of Hicks Holdings, replace Purslow and Ayre, was rejected.

Broughton is confident he and the other two England-based members of the board have acted appropriately but they will not be able to have that confirmed until the issue is thrashed out in court.

The Premier League is also expected to approve the takeover by New England Sports Ventures (NESV) that will see John W Henry's company purchase Liverpool for £300 million - which will wipe out most of the club's debt - on Friday.

It is thought the deal will be fully completed by the time Liverpool cross Stanley Park for the Merseyside derby against Everton on October 17 and it is reported that, even if Hicks and Gillett win the court case, RBS will call in the debt and immediately sell the club to Henry.

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=830505&sec=england&cc=4716

要上法庭解決了
離線火鳳凰
發帖
91264
好友元
54168
閱讀權限
91264
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 65  發表于: 2010-10-08
呢篇有個利記 fans 寫既,係法律觀念上而家既情況︰

http://www.liverpool-kop.com/2010/10/broughton-vs-hicks-current-lfc-legal.html

佢寫得都非常詳細下,仲有埋的相關 legal document 睇,有興趣既可以入去睇下,無興趣就睇佢個 conclusion 就可以了︰


What’s likely to happen?
It is by no means a foregone conclusion that the sale will go through, and it is entirely possible that the high Court will rule in favour of Hicks and Gillett. If that happens, unless H+G find the money to repay the RBS loans, their holding company – Kop Football Ltd – will go into administration; RBS will then sell the club, and the end result will be the same: NESV as owners.
The worst case scenario is that Hicks and Gillett have found someone to fund their refinancing deal, and given the zeal with which they’re trying to veto the NESV deal, that possibility shouldn’t be discounted.
If the High Court rules in H+G’s favour, the sacking of Purslow and Ayres will be duly ratified; Hicks’ two new board members will stay, giving him a majority; the board will then reject the NESV bid; the RBS loans will be refinanced, and H+G will hang on a little longer for a bigger deal.
Nobody wants this to happen, and to be honest, I don’t really think it will. However, fans should prepare themselves for something like this...just in case!
離線freezefox
發帖
160128
好友元
326552
閱讀權限
259770
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 66  發表于: 2010-10-08
最遲幾時會解決?


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線火鳳凰
發帖
91264
好友元
54168
閱讀權限
91264
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 67  發表于: 2010-10-08
引用第66樓freezefox2010-10-08 10:55發表的“”:
最遲幾時會解決?


oct 15……

到時仲未解決到的話就有以下風險︰


http://www.teamtalk.com/liverpool/6433374/Liverpool-points-deduction-a-risk-

Liverpool points deduction a 'risk'
Thursday 7th October 2010 20:43

Liverpool would be at risk of a nine-point deduction if the owners' holding company is put into administration, it has emerged.

Initially it had been thought the Premier League would not penalise the club for Kop Holdings becoming insolvent, but now the threat of a points deduction has become a serious one.

The Royal Bank of Scotland could put Kop Holdings, the company owned by Tom Hicks and George Gillett, into administration if the Americans continue to block a takeover by New England Sports Ventures and have not paid off their £280million debt to the bank by October 15.

Under Premier League rules, the fact that the holding company is solely concerned with the ownership of Liverpool and football-related matters could trigger the nine-point penalty.

An insider said: "It is not completely clear whether the nine-point penalty would come into play but it would be a risk."

West Ham has been used as an example of why the Reds might escape a deduction if administration goes ahead when it was owned by Icelandic bank Straumur.

However, the Hammers were a solvent part of a whole portfolio of different companies while Kop Holdings is solely concerned with Liverpool.

Hicks and Gillett's legal action against the proposed takeover will begin in the High Court next week.
離線freezefox
發帖
160128
好友元
326552
閱讀權限
259770
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 68  發表于: 2010-10-08
引用第67樓火鳳凰2010-10-08 10:57發表的“”:



我驚個兩個老野同我地攬住死,一拍兩散咋。


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線ODIN
發帖
29733
好友元
0
閱讀權限
29733
貢獻值
5
只看該作者 69  發表于: 2010-10-08
引用第68樓freezefox2010-10-08 10:59發表的“”:
我驚個兩個老野同我地攬住死,一拍兩散咋。 [表情] [表情]



都係求財姐...唔會同自己d錢過唔去掛~
離線freezefox
發帖
160128
好友元
326552
閱讀權限
259770
貢獻值
13
只看該作者 70  發表于: 2010-10-08
引用第69樓liuming2010-10-08 11:00發表的“”:
都係求財姐...唔會同自己d錢過唔去掛~



好難講。有D人 既心態好怪,唔可以輸,輸,就寧願寧哂,輸少少反而唔制。輸都無哂先開心。


YFF 已死!!這是 Fantrax 的新時代!!
離線火鳳凰
發帖
91264
好友元
54168
閱讀權限
91264
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 71  發表于: 2010-10-08
引用第68樓freezefox2010-10-08 10:59發表的“”:
我驚個兩個老野同我地攬住死,一拍兩散咋。 [表情] [表情]


引用第69樓liuming2010-10-08 11:00發表的“”:



都係求財姐...唔會同自己d錢過唔去掛~


係生意上黎諗,我做佢地都會咁做,而家俾你咁樣 sell 左間球會,一個仙都拎唔返,剩蝕 144m,我係佢地都一定會周旋到底,最多一拍兩散……

而家你地 fans 最希望發生既情況有︰

(1) 法庭駁回 H&G,賣盤可如期進行

(2) 法庭 in favor of H&G,RBS 接手,但係就有辦法唔駛扣九分
離線火鳳凰
發帖
91264
好友元
54168
閱讀權限
91264
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 72  發表于: 2010-10-08
引用第70樓freezefox2010-10-08 11:01發表的“”:
好難講。有D人 既心態好怪,唔可以輸,輸,就寧願寧哂,輸少少反而唔制。輸都無哂先開心。 [表情] [表情]


最弊佢地而家唔係輸少少,而係輸晒,一個仙都拎唔返,你做佢都一定會鬥到底啦……
離線ODIN
發帖
29733
好友元
0
閱讀權限
29733
貢獻值
5
只看該作者 73  發表于: 2010-10-08
引用第71樓火鳳凰2010-10-08 11:03發表的“”:
係生意上黎諗,我做佢地都會咁做,而家俾你咁樣 sell 左間球會,一個仙都拎唔返,剩蝕 144m,我係佢地都一定會周旋到底,最多一拍兩散…… [表情]
而家你地 fans 最希望發生既情況有︰
.......



唉...愈睇愈似亞視...
離線posouth
發帖
27659
好友元
127993
閱讀權限
27679
貢獻值
2
只看該作者 74  發表于: 2010-10-08
引用第65樓火鳳凰2010-10-08 10:53發表的“”:
呢篇有個利記 fans 寫既,係法律觀念上而家既情況︰
http://www.liverpool-kop.com/2010/10/broughton-vs-hicks-current-lfc-legal.html
佢寫得都非常詳細下,仲有埋的相關 legal document 睇,有興趣既可以入去睇下,無興趣就睇佢個 conclusion 就可以了︰
.......

果然非常長, 剩係睇咗D bold咗部份. 最後個結論好似五五波咁, 好難講會點判.........
Miss you James and Bobby! Thank you for the years of great memories!!